Last week we reported on the EPA’s upcoming plans to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Yesterday 18 United States governors including Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty sent a letter to the EPA to protest the upcoming regulations. The governors are worried about the EPA’s ability to properly oversee the regulations as well as the potential cost on industry and the states’ governments in light of our frail economy.
18 US Governors Write to EPA to Say Emissions Limits Will Hurt the Economy
by Brit Liggett, 03/11/10
Related Posts
-
On January 2nd the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) new permitting regulations for large stationary polluters went into effect and the state of Texas isn’t at
-
The EPA has been trying to enforce harsher permitting processes to keep large stationary polluters from spewing greenhouse gasses (GHG) into the atmosphere, however its
-
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson testified in front of a Senate appropriations subcommittee Wednesday about the EPA’s planned carbon permit policy. Last year Jackson told lawmakers
5 Responses to “18 US Governors Write to EPA to Say Emissions Limits Will Hurt the Economy”
-
Featured Author
-
Read Inhabitat
-
Search Categories
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
-
Browse by Keyword
follow inhabitat on:
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
© Inhabitat.com 2012 | About Inhabitat | Contact Us | Advertising with Inhabitat | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Inhabitat, LLC
























Great info.
They care so much about the economy, but seem to miss the point that regulation like this can and most likely will encourage competition and promote economic sustainability in the long run. Aside from that, without a stable climate our economy will be the last thing we care about – and if our society survives major climate destabilization, the economic future cost of NOT regulating emissions will be orders of magnitude greater than the small hit we take when we start limiting emissions today.
These complaints and omissions of climate/environmental concerns are short-sighted and wrong.
The environment is more important than the economy. The economy is important, of course, but a stable market doesn’t matter when you can’t breathe because of toxins in the air and you can’t eat because farmland has become desert. If the highest priority is survival, the environment has to come first.
i agree with steady and will,
and my future children’s physical health is what i care about most, i ONLY spend money on strictly all green businesses and have dedicate all time into eco-friendly options anyways… no compromises when it comes to the environment.
But Emissions are good for Us! …
http://imgur.com/1HCox.jpg