<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amtrak and California High-Speed Rail Authority Team Up to Design New High-Speed Trains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/amtrak-and-california-high-speed-rail-authority-team-up-to-design-new-high-speed-trains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/amtrak-and-california-high-speed-rail-authority-team-up-to-design-new-high-speed-trains/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: philatonian</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/amtrak-and-california-high-speed-rail-authority-team-up-to-design-new-high-speed-trains/comment-page-1/#comment-504755</link>
		<dc:creator>philatonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=476894#comment-504755</guid>
		<description>Too bad they haven&#039;t mentioned laying new tracks. The Acela has a top speed of 150 but rarely exceeds 70 because it shares the tracks with the regional lines. 

Without new tracks you won&#039;t be getting to Boston in 2.5 hours, you&#039;ll be sitting behind a regional train going to same speed as you would in the Acela, but with a much pricier ticket to cover the $55M bucket you&#039;re in. 

I love the idea of high speed trains, but the Northeast corridor already has one, the Acela. You can board a train capable of 700MPH, but if it&#039;s sharing the track with a Wilmington bound local, you&#039;re going 80 at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad they haven&#8217;t mentioned laying new tracks. The Acela has a top speed of 150 but rarely exceeds 70 because it shares the tracks with the regional lines. </p>
<p>Without new tracks you won&#8217;t be getting to Boston in 2.5 hours, you&#8217;ll be sitting behind a regional train going to same speed as you would in the Acela, but with a much pricier ticket to cover the $55M bucket you&#8217;re in. </p>
<p>I love the idea of high speed trains, but the Northeast corridor already has one, the Acela. You can board a train capable of 700MPH, but if it&#8217;s sharing the track with a Wilmington bound local, you&#8217;re going 80 at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
