It’s a simple idea. While we might not usually think about it this way, tropical rainforests are the world’s giant wood store, and just like shoplifters lurk in your local Target, treelifters scheme to fraudulently help themselves to timber supplies. Your local retailer protects themself by electronically tagging merchandise and keeping a hawk’s eye on inventory, and Helveta, a British tech company, feels that forests can benefit from the same methods. So far, the company has hammered plastic barcodes (or barkodes, if you will) onto a million trees across Africa, southeast Asia and South America to help countries keep track of timber reserves, and they’re not done yet.
Barcoding Millions of Trees Could Relieve Global Warming
by Yuka Yoneda, 07/16/09
filed under: global warming
Related Posts
-
Photo courtesy of Luc Bollen Housing crisis = fewer houses being built = less wood = better for trees, right? Not so fast says a new report
-
No one was silly enough to think that the death of Osama Bin Laden would mean the end of the Taliban, but it seems that
-
I’ve just recently moved into a place that was gut-renovated, and the prospect of being able to choose my own flooring has got me thinking
6 Responses to “Barcoding Millions of Trees Could Relieve Global Warming”
-
Featured Author
Meet the Tiny House Family Who Built an Amazing Mini Home for Just $12,000
Kohler Makes a Splash at ICFF with a Neon Chartreuse Shipping Container Booth
BRC Designs’ American Pipe Dream Chair and Table Are Made from a Maze of Copper Piping
At Labo’s Wood Veneer Lamps Are Puzzles You Put Together Yourself
This author's twitter feed is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
-
Read Inhabitat
-
Search Categories
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
-
Browse by Keyword
follow inhabitat on:
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
© Inhabitat.com 2012 | About Inhabitat | Contact Us | Advertising with Inhabitat | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Inhabitat, LLC






















Way to go Helveta. I hope implementation of your simply / genious idea actually works!
Two problems here: PLASTIC tags and little benefit.
The plastic part should be obvious on its own, so I won’t say any more. The benefit problem I see here is that shoplifters at stores are controlled by RFID and controlled entrances/exits, not just by the tags on the products themselves. I fail to see how tagging these trees will somehow control whether those trees are poached or not.
If anything it will lead to a new black market in plastic tags and IDs. So this seems like a horrible waste of energy and resources for something that will have little perceived benefit.
Hey AaronT,
Good point about the plastic. That’s obviously not a good thing. But what it good is that the tags are tiny (hopefully they are also made from recycled plastics although I am not hopeful on that point). In terms of the actual tagging process, here’s what Reuters said in their original article:
Officials in remote forests use handheld computers to scan the tags from the moment a tree is felled to its processing and export, and the live data is put onto Helveta’s secure database.
Every tree above a certain size in a plantation is given an individual barcode. When a tree is cut down, another barcode is attached to the stump and more tags are nailed to the processed wood to allow customs officials to audit exports at the docks.
Government officials and companies can track individual trees through the supply chain and view computerised maps of forests on the database. Timber leaving a forest or factory without tags will immediately be viewed as illegal, Newton said.
I agree with you that people on the black market might try to bootleg the tags, but Helveta seems to be on top of their game and even criminals do cost/benefit risk/rewards analysis to see whether making fake tags, hacking into the system and all the other hassle will be worth it. What my article is basically trying to say is that I think a lot of criminal WON’T think it’s worth it and quit. Guess time will tell, but thanks for bringing up your great points.
How about just using the ring pattern to identify a tree instead of bothering with labels that can be removed? Isn’t the ring pattern pretty much unique to each tree, like our finger prints?
If it works, just do it.
Ricardo Coelho
http://cooltheearth.wordpress.com/
Printed paper tags would fade over time pretty quickly in the tropics.