<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workspace of the Future: Cambridge&#8217;s Creative Exchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nofelix</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-115924</link>
		<dc:creator>nofelix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/#comment-115924</guid>
		<description>angie717 -

Because 90 degree angles are efficient? It&#039;s easy to fit furniture in right angled corners, Cladding materials and flooring systems are made rectilinear, as are many other things.

If you could save a lot of energy/material by using different shapes I&#039;m sure they would have done it. If they were using different materials (like earth filled tires) that don&#039;t work better with 90 degree angles then fine, criticize away. But it&#039;s not a bad thing to use cubes just because they&#039;re simple.

Then again, if you made something that looks more than superficially like this in your first semester then maybe you&#039;re a genius and know more than I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>angie717 -</p>
<p>Because 90 degree angles are efficient? It&#8217;s easy to fit furniture in right angled corners, Cladding materials and flooring systems are made rectilinear, as are many other things.</p>
<p>If you could save a lot of energy/material by using different shapes I&#8217;m sure they would have done it. If they were using different materials (like earth filled tires) that don&#8217;t work better with 90 degree angles then fine, criticize away. But it&#8217;s not a bad thing to use cubes just because they&#8217;re simple.</p>
<p>Then again, if you made something that looks more than superficially like this in your first semester then maybe you&#8217;re a genius and know more than I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angie717</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-115755</link>
		<dc:creator>angie717</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/#comment-115755</guid>
		<description>I get that this building is &quot;green&quot; and uses solar energy, and I think that&#039;s great.  We should use more of this technology in our buildings.  However, why do architects and designers that build &quot;green&quot; and modern buildings seem to be obsessed with 90 degree angles and cubes?  This somewhat resembles my final project from my first semester of architecture...which isn&#039;t a compliment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that this building is &#8220;green&#8221; and uses solar energy, and I think that&#8217;s great.  We should use more of this technology in our buildings.  However, why do architects and designers that build &#8220;green&#8221; and modern buildings seem to be obsessed with 90 degree angles and cubes?  This somewhat resembles my final project from my first semester of architecture&#8230;which isn&#8217;t a compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisp68</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-115689</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisp68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/#comment-115689</guid>
		<description>Please tell me this is not the future.  This is so far from eco friendly, if not just a monstrosity to look at!  Looks like a beach house on stilts gone bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me this is not the future.  This is so far from eco friendly, if not just a monstrosity to look at!  Looks like a beach house on stilts gone bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
