Comments on: ECO-BRIDGE: Chicago’s New Harborside Green Space

By: Pointspecial

Pointspecial — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:49:31 +0000

I’ve made extensive comments on this elsewhere…

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=152687&page=5

Comments 95, 97, and 99.

This is a travesty as currently designed.

By: buddha

buddha — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:10:03 +0000

I like the wind turbines. But really that money should be used on trains, and buses. How about putting Lakeshore Drive underground, making it a greenway and put wind turbines all along that.

By: Chicago Streeterville Resident

Chicago Streeterville Resident — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:23:02 +0000

Chicago is definitily NOT becoming the greenest city. As another poster pointed out, it is total PR spin for the IOC (and the uninformed). This past Wednesday the City Council voted IN FAVOR of the Chicago Children’s Museum land grab in GRANT PARK— public land that was previously protected by law from development for 175 years! Mayor Daley and The Pritkzer’s will not be happy until Grant Park is fully developed to their taste and myopic urban vision (with their sur names emblazoned on every new structure).

As for Calatrava’s COLOSSAL 2000 ft. phallic tower, this building is massive compared to its neighboring buildings, It grossly dwarfts them, not to mention its immedaite proximity to the lake front and the Chicago River is problemtic.

IINHABITAT suggests The (Uncircumsized) Spire is PROJECTED to get LEED Gold Rating. Really? You believe the developer, do you? With 1200 condos multiplied by at least one parking space for each unit, how does an influx of a minimum of 1200 cars (i.e., luxury SUVs and gas guzzlers) warrant anything remotely near a LEEDgreen rating?

BTW: I walk 2 miles to work every morning— often times at my own peril— since Chicago cares more about the right-of-way of cars and buses than pedestrians. The city’s “Traffic Management Security” is a joke!

By: cpine

cpine — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:23:15 +0000

….then again, this, along with Calatrava’s Next Big Erection, is intended to accentuate the differences between international monetary power and the poverty of local needs — sort of like Dubai. Like the Palestinians and Indians who have no rights in that shining city, Chicago’s elite will accept imported Central American labor to build all this, and then work to have them deported, so that they don’t mess up the Olympian scenary.

By: cpine

cpine — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:12:33 +0000

Burnham said, “Make no small plans — they have no power to stir men’s blood!” Of course, he had little sense of the Law of Unintended Consequences either…. Looks good in the rendering, sort of like all Imaginary Cities, geometric and pristine, but as a functioning, ecologically (humanly and environmentally) sensible series of integrated programs — No way!! More Daley Dynasty pyramid-building…good honest graft…

By: todd

todd — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:32:43 +0000

Haha, if Chicago is the greenest city we are all in some serious trouble. There is no recycling in the entire city. None. And it smells like a sewer. Not to mention the CTA buses get 2 miles per gallon. I\’ve never seen a bigger excuse of pork barreling either. Pathetic. And they justify the amount of time and resources this project will take with a few wind turbines. Get a clue.

By: Universe Man

Universe Man — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:42:08 +0000

Just because something allows people to enjoy nature doesn’t make it green.

By: sealyah

sealyah — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:54:55 +0000

As someone who has sailed out of that harbor for 45 years, I can guarrantee this design will be a complete disaster for the sailing community. The existing inner breakwall extends south (down) from just east of the boat docks at the top of the rendering to just south of Buckingham Fountain and then angles in along the line of mooring cans shown at the south end. This existing harbor is already too large to protect moored boats from being damaged by high winds and waves. White caps, wind driven breaking waves, are common. Permanant slips would be dangerous to use and impossible to insure. The small exit to the lake would be a constant source of congestion, near misses, and accidents. The rendering shows faint lines ot the outer breakwall at the top right. This would have to be removed at least up to the Chicago Light. This plan is about as useful as Daley\’s miles of wrought iron fencing and mid-street planters, and does as little to improve life in the city.

By: ship

ship — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:16:00 +0000

i agree with ryan s. although chicago does great things & i love this city to death…they sure know how to sugar coat things. how we are considered a truly “green” city is beyond me. i was just behind a double decker tour bus yesterday that blew out so much black smoke I couldn’t see.

By: AmberFoxOne

AmberFoxOne — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:19:51 +0000

Fascinating. Its nice to see cities at least trying to conserve energy. This looks like a very clean concept.

JT
http://www.Fireme.To/udi

By: Ryan S

Ryan S — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:03:54 +0000

Our city doesnt even have a functioning recycling program outside the 1st Ward, and our public transportation agency is a disaster and almost shut down on three separate occasions last year. There is almost nothing green about this city besides the PR spin.

By: luther4000

luther4000 — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:12:41 +0000

I think it is at least questionable that a few wind turbines are enough to qualify this humongous intervention into the Lake as a “green Initiative”. It appears that an initiative that is not green at all like creating a huge space dedicated to humand activities (not considering at all the ecosistems of the lake affected by it) just added wind turbines to wash its face and gain approval from the authorities and city movements.