<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China To Connect Its High Speed Rail All The Way To Europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:53:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazyreader</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-291171</link>
		<dc:creator>lazyreader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-291171</guid>
		<description>Before we start praising High-speed rail does not carry cargo.So by sharing the highway with both passenger cars and commercial trucks, interstate highways reduce the costs to both. They offer &quot;No&quot; point to point service, it goes from city center to city center............click......
http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=4372</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we start praising High-speed rail does not carry cargo.So by sharing the highway with both passenger cars and commercial trucks, interstate highways reduce the costs to both. They offer &#8220;No&#8221; point to point service, it goes from city center to city center&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;click&#8230;&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=4372" rel="nofollow">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=4372</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shahul</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-290884</link>
		<dc:creator>shahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-290884</guid>
		<description>i hope for the day when i can travel to chennai from kuala lumpur by HST, i have always been a train fan in india, but india although has raised speed , still runs dirty and uncomfortable trains and is very crowded. Dr Mahathir of malaysia first sounded out the trans asian railway connecting singapore to china and then to india, but corruption has led to the malaysian railway development to choose a slower line with a lot of technical problems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope for the day when i can travel to chennai from kuala lumpur by HST, i have always been a train fan in india, but india although has raised speed , still runs dirty and uncomfortable trains and is very crowded. Dr Mahathir of malaysia first sounded out the trans asian railway connecting singapore to china and then to india, but corruption has led to the malaysian railway development to choose a slower line with a lot of technical problems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazyreader</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-286870</link>
		<dc:creator>lazyreader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-286870</guid>
		<description>I forgot this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM6J7xY4S7I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot this one: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM6J7xY4S7I" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM6J7xY4S7I</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazyreader</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-286869</link>
		<dc:creator>lazyreader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-286869</guid>
		<description>Who forgets China isn&#039;t a capitalist country.  Watch these: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwXA5wv0zwI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who forgets China isn&#8217;t a capitalist country.  Watch these: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwXA5wv0zwI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwXA5wv0zwI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gkh77</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-274467</link>
		<dc:creator>gkh77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-274467</guid>
		<description>A couple of points.

Military use of HSR? The claim that an intercontinental HSR link is somehow going to make China more of a military threat is absurd. First and foremost, China already has a massive traditional railroad network which is more than sufficient in ferrying troops around the country in preparation for a land war. However, this point is moot because the existance of railroads will not *help* a country invade another country more effectively. Let&#039;s look at this logically. Who in their right mind will build a railroad through the territory of a country they intend to invade? I&#039;ve never heard of a division of troops hopping off trains in enemy territory launch an invasion. The whole idea is comical and a disaster waiting to happen. One artillary shell or missile will derail the train and annihilate all the troops within it. For the sake of argument, even if China did manage to capture a large swath of territory in their target country, what&#039;s going to stop that country&#039;s military from destroying the tracks before they retreat? How will the Chinese army make use of the railroad then? That&#039;s textbook military strategy that even a JROTC student would understand. 

What railroads actually do is to provide logistical support once a country is already at war. However, that point is also irrelevent to this discussion because HSR is not the network needed for that purpose. Instead, a traditional and slower speed network is required which as I&#039;ve already mentioned, China already has one. In anycase, all of the previous points are strictly academic because China isn&#039;t going to start a massive war with their neighbors and jeopardize all the progress they&#039;ve made during the past 30 years. 

HSR versus air travel? The advantages of HSR over airplane over short distances is already well documented and proven. It&#039;s no competition. With that said, I&#039;ll restrict my points to travel distances of 1000 miles or more. 

Basically, there are two competing schools of thoughts at work here. On one side we have speed and other other side we have comfort. Personally, I&#039;m more concerned with comfort. For starters, the economic class on your typical HSR train is far more tolerable than their airline equivalent. This is not to mention airline security and check-in across the world is reaching the level of lunacy these days. Now don&#039;t get me wrong, there are and always will be a lot of people that will continue to choose air travel because they want to get to their destination as quickly as possible. However for a lot of casual travelers (such as tourists), HSR is a very viable alternative and it will be utilized extensively. 

I for one hope this HSR project will get completed soon. I would love to be able to take the HSR to destinations such as Vietnam, Thailand or Singapore when I&#039;m in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points.</p>
<p>Military use of HSR? The claim that an intercontinental HSR link is somehow going to make China more of a military threat is absurd. First and foremost, China already has a massive traditional railroad network which is more than sufficient in ferrying troops around the country in preparation for a land war. However, this point is moot because the existance of railroads will not *help* a country invade another country more effectively. Let&#8217;s look at this logically. Who in their right mind will build a railroad through the territory of a country they intend to invade? I&#8217;ve never heard of a division of troops hopping off trains in enemy territory launch an invasion. The whole idea is comical and a disaster waiting to happen. One artillary shell or missile will derail the train and annihilate all the troops within it. For the sake of argument, even if China did manage to capture a large swath of territory in their target country, what&#8217;s going to stop that country&#8217;s military from destroying the tracks before they retreat? How will the Chinese army make use of the railroad then? That&#8217;s textbook military strategy that even a JROTC student would understand. </p>
<p>What railroads actually do is to provide logistical support once a country is already at war. However, that point is also irrelevent to this discussion because HSR is not the network needed for that purpose. Instead, a traditional and slower speed network is required which as I&#8217;ve already mentioned, China already has one. In anycase, all of the previous points are strictly academic because China isn&#8217;t going to start a massive war with their neighbors and jeopardize all the progress they&#8217;ve made during the past 30 years. </p>
<p>HSR versus air travel? The advantages of HSR over airplane over short distances is already well documented and proven. It&#8217;s no competition. With that said, I&#8217;ll restrict my points to travel distances of 1000 miles or more. </p>
<p>Basically, there are two competing schools of thoughts at work here. On one side we have speed and other other side we have comfort. Personally, I&#8217;m more concerned with comfort. For starters, the economic class on your typical HSR train is far more tolerable than their airline equivalent. This is not to mention airline security and check-in across the world is reaching the level of lunacy these days. Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, there are and always will be a lot of people that will continue to choose air travel because they want to get to their destination as quickly as possible. However for a lot of casual travelers (such as tourists), HSR is a very viable alternative and it will be utilized extensively. </p>
<p>I for one hope this HSR project will get completed soon. I would love to be able to take the HSR to destinations such as Vietnam, Thailand or Singapore when I&#8217;m in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knut</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-271540</link>
		<dc:creator>Knut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 17:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-271540</guid>
		<description>@Richard: What is it that in any US discussion sooner or later wars/war industries must be included? Is it because the US is on the way to be 100 years on wars around the world with no break? Anyways, I&#039;m far more concerned about another possibly Republican US administration starting another needless war based on lies at Iran or Jemen or where ever else they want to lay their hands on commodities (by claiming to bring democracy to those countries! - nice little joke), than about any developing Asian country developing their countries. But in one point you are right: China&#039;s army is the oldest in the world and for sure one of the toughest. Even the Russian Army adopted The Art of War by Sun Tzu, written 2,500 years in the past, to train their officers. If you had read the book you would know why China&#039;s army is so awesome. It&#039;s because the Chinese Army, other then the US Army, only fight war&#039;s if their is absolutely no other choice. When you have a closer look at the actual economical situation the Chinese took another road than fighting a war. Meanwhile 1/4 of the US is owned by the Chinese. A developing country buy itself a Christmas gift by buying a first world country and not just a random country. No, they bought the selfproclaimed N° 1 of the world. Astonishing clever for some &quot;stupid, war-loving commies&quot;, huh? ;-) And they still have the money to build such an awesome infrastucture project, bringing Europe and Asia even closer together. Not that this would be neccessary as the connections, especially the business connections, are already pretty close. This is not a one way railway project. It goes both directions. Every country on the way will profit from it. Well, not the US and that&#039;s maybe the reason why your arguments are as they are ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard: What is it that in any US discussion sooner or later wars/war industries must be included? Is it because the US is on the way to be 100 years on wars around the world with no break? Anyways, I&#8217;m far more concerned about another possibly Republican US administration starting another needless war based on lies at Iran or Jemen or where ever else they want to lay their hands on commodities (by claiming to bring democracy to those countries! &#8211; nice little joke), than about any developing Asian country developing their countries. But in one point you are right: China&#8217;s army is the oldest in the world and for sure one of the toughest. Even the Russian Army adopted The Art of War by Sun Tzu, written 2,500 years in the past, to train their officers. If you had read the book you would know why China&#8217;s army is so awesome. It&#8217;s because the Chinese Army, other then the US Army, only fight war&#8217;s if their is absolutely no other choice. When you have a closer look at the actual economical situation the Chinese took another road than fighting a war. Meanwhile 1/4 of the US is owned by the Chinese. A developing country buy itself a Christmas gift by buying a first world country and not just a random country. No, they bought the selfproclaimed N° 1 of the world. Astonishing clever for some &#8220;stupid, war-loving commies&#8221;, huh? <img src='http://inhabitat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  And they still have the money to build such an awesome infrastucture project, bringing Europe and Asia even closer together. Not that this would be neccessary as the connections, especially the business connections, are already pretty close. This is not a one way railway project. It goes both directions. Every country on the way will profit from it. Well, not the US and that&#8217;s maybe the reason why your arguments are as they are <img src='http://inhabitat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmolf</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-271532</link>
		<dc:creator>madmolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-271532</guid>
		<description>@Richard_Chamberlin :
Well it took seven long months before someone puts aside political correctness and brings up the chinese agenda. To make it short, as the roman had the &quot;Via Publicae&quot; to project themselves all across their empire, i believe this is some &quot;Via Chinea&quot; being planned. No need to come out of Wespoint to understand this. 
I&#039;m all for the peaceful use, but let&#039;s keep real.
On the side, your comment made me less lonely (or looney) :°)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard_Chamberlin :<br />
Well it took seven long months before someone puts aside political correctness and brings up the chinese agenda. To make it short, as the roman had the &#8220;Via Publicae&#8221; to project themselves all across their empire, i believe this is some &#8220;Via Chinea&#8221; being planned. No need to come out of Wespoint to understand this.<br />
I&#8217;m all for the peaceful use, but let&#8217;s keep real.<br />
On the side, your comment made me less lonely (or looney) :°)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard_Chamberlin</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-271227</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard_Chamberlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-271227</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, the country with the largest standing army in the entire world wants to build a very fast train network throughout Asia, Europe, Britain, Russia, India? Well, what could go wrong with that? Nothing to see here, move along, please...

And, some of you people have no understanding of the role that the USA has played in keeping your collective behinds safe. Do you think Scandanavia would not have succumbed to a Nazi invasion if it had not been rebuffed elsewhere when it was? Do you understand who is largely or primarily responsible for that salvation? And do you actually not recall the imperialism or otherwise land-grabbing military actions of Japan, Vietnam, Korea, Russia/USSR x 3 or more, Iraq - and I don&#039;t know the details in Africa to elucidate them, but they exist, brutally. People, it&#039;s OK to be liberal, but it&#039;s not OK to be stupid OR ignorant. Even worse, you are intelligent and educated enough to make your beliefs/comments inexcusable.

None of this means that this rail system might not be a great thing - just don&#039;t pretend that it&#039;s wrong to bring up the military possibilities, and do NOT pretend that the US is the evil monster of the planet and all other countries are blameless. You really deserve more respect than that from yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, the country with the largest standing army in the entire world wants to build a very fast train network throughout Asia, Europe, Britain, Russia, India? Well, what could go wrong with that? Nothing to see here, move along, please&#8230;</p>
<p>And, some of you people have no understanding of the role that the USA has played in keeping your collective behinds safe. Do you think Scandanavia would not have succumbed to a Nazi invasion if it had not been rebuffed elsewhere when it was? Do you understand who is largely or primarily responsible for that salvation? And do you actually not recall the imperialism or otherwise land-grabbing military actions of Japan, Vietnam, Korea, Russia/USSR x 3 or more, Iraq &#8211; and I don&#8217;t know the details in Africa to elucidate them, but they exist, brutally. People, it&#8217;s OK to be liberal, but it&#8217;s not OK to be stupid OR ignorant. Even worse, you are intelligent and educated enough to make your beliefs/comments inexcusable.</p>
<p>None of this means that this rail system might not be a great thing &#8211; just don&#8217;t pretend that it&#8217;s wrong to bring up the military possibilities, and do NOT pretend that the US is the evil monster of the planet and all other countries are blameless. You really deserve more respect than that from yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amtrak To Buy Electric Trains For $466 Million &#124; Inhabitat - Green Design Will Save the World</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-271012</link>
		<dc:creator>Amtrak To Buy Electric Trains For $466 Million &#124; Inhabitat - Green Design Will Save the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-271012</guid>
		<description>[...] looks like the United States is finally getting on board the high-speed rail bandwagon. While China and Europe may have embraced the benefits of this green form of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looks like the United States is finally getting on board the high-speed rail bandwagon. While China and Europe may have embraced the benefits of this green form of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Mearns</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-266365</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Mearns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-266365</guid>
		<description>Mankind is great at two things, construction and destruction.  This will be one of the greatest constructions feats is history, it will bring peoples together and break down more of those awful barriers which caused two world wars.  Bring it on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mankind is great at two things, construction and destruction.  This will be one of the greatest constructions feats is history, it will bring peoples together and break down more of those awful barriers which caused two world wars.  Bring it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Main Station Stuttgart: A New High Speed Rail Station &#124; Inhabitat - Green Design Will Save the World</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-252789</link>
		<dc:creator>Main Station Stuttgart: A New High Speed Rail Station &#124; Inhabitat - Green Design Will Save the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-252789</guid>
		<description>[...] the old, so trains can pass through instead of having to back out, which is critical in order for high speed rail to work efficiently. The station is currently under development and is expected to be completed by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the old, so trains can pass through instead of having to back out, which is critical in order for high speed rail to work efficiently. The station is currently under development and is expected to be completed by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwtillc</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-244986</link>
		<dc:creator>mwtillc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-244986</guid>
		<description>very nice post.this tells a reader that how a HSR link will be spread all over the world and how it is usefull ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice post.this tells a reader that how a HSR link will be spread all over the world and how it is usefull ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnbms16</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-232467</link>
		<dc:creator>tnbms16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-232467</guid>
		<description>The comments noting that a transcontinental HSR link can never compete with air travel on speed are of course correct, but they miss the point. That&#039;s not why the Chinese are going to build this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments noting that a transcontinental HSR link can never compete with air travel on speed are of course correct, but they miss the point. That&#8217;s not why the Chinese are going to build this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siddharth</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-220455</link>
		<dc:creator>siddharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-220455</guid>
		<description>Very ambitious, but wouldn&#039;t this be an easy target for terrorists? How do they plan to keep the whole stretch safe from sabotage or attacks. If even a single stretch of railway tracks is blown up, it would render the whole route useless. HSR connecting the immediate neighborhood of south east asian countries and the land locked central asian countries sounds sensible though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very ambitious, but wouldn&#8217;t this be an easy target for terrorists? How do they plan to keep the whole stretch safe from sabotage or attacks. If even a single stretch of railway tracks is blown up, it would render the whole route useless. HSR connecting the immediate neighborhood of south east asian countries and the land locked central asian countries sounds sensible though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ko</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-219197</link>
		<dc:creator>ko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-219197</guid>
		<description>Regarding the comments about China &quot;Stealing&quot; HSR technology:

whomever believes this is badly mis-informed. Numerous Eropean and Japanese companies have been participating in conventional and HSR projects for years exporting to China and building rolling stock in joint-venture factories. These consortiums make much profits for these companies, which include (rolling sock and infrastructure):

AD trans
Alstom
Bombasier
Hitachi
Kawasaki
Siemens

Chinese partners have improved upon their technology and particularly, developed fast-track infrastructure constructiion methods that are world class, and one means by which such large scale trains systems can be realized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the comments about China &#8220;Stealing&#8221; HSR technology:</p>
<p>whomever believes this is badly mis-informed. Numerous Eropean and Japanese companies have been participating in conventional and HSR projects for years exporting to China and building rolling stock in joint-venture factories. These consortiums make much profits for these companies, which include (rolling sock and infrastructure):</p>
<p>AD trans<br />
Alstom<br />
Bombasier<br />
Hitachi<br />
Kawasaki<br />
Siemens</p>
<p>Chinese partners have improved upon their technology and particularly, developed fast-track infrastructure constructiion methods that are world class, and one means by which such large scale trains systems can be realized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gvmetm</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-217456</link>
		<dc:creator>gvmetm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-217456</guid>
		<description>this is great news. This will definitely raise the standard of living for the countries involved. Didn&#039;t James Hill tried to do this about a 100 years ago when he got intro steamboat business to export cotton to Japan? Unfortunately, the US congress killed it when it passed the Sherman Antitrust Act. I hope to see this complete. 

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is great news. This will definitely raise the standard of living for the countries involved. Didn&#8217;t James Hill tried to do this about a 100 years ago when he got intro steamboat business to export cotton to Japan? Unfortunately, the US congress killed it when it passed the Sherman Antitrust Act. I hope to see this complete. </p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Jakeman</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-217313</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Jakeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-217313</guid>
		<description>Lang wrote: &quot;The journey will take about two days? Probably one of those days will be mostly taken up by that section of the journey from the south coast of the UK to St. Pancras.&quot;

I think you&#039;d better wake up. The high-speed Channel Tunnel Rail Link between St Pancras and the Channel Tunnel has been up and running for years already.

Where have you been?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lang wrote: &#8220;The journey will take about two days? Probably one of those days will be mostly taken up by that section of the journey from the south coast of the UK to St. Pancras.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;d better wake up. The high-speed Channel Tunnel Rail Link between St Pancras and the Channel Tunnel has been up and running for years already.</p>
<p>Where have you been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridgette Meinhold</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-217274</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridgette Meinhold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-217274</guid>
		<description>In response to Hsu-Liu: Yes I still uphold to China having the most advanced and extensive HSR line in the world. They have the fastest trains and the newest technology, as well as the largest network. Although, I do not know how they compare in numbers of HSR stations. Maybe that&#039;s what you mean.
&quot;China, for example, has the world’s largest high speed rail network at just over 3,728 miles (6,000 km)... Prior to China’s construction of new high speed rail lines in 2007, Japan had the world’s largest high speed train network at 1,528 mi (2,459 km).&quot; via &lt;a href=&quot;http://geography.about.com/od/urbaneconomicgeography/a/highspeedtrains.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about.com&lt;/a&gt;
And &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_speed_rail#High-speed_railways_by_region&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; shows they have 6,552 miles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Hsu-Liu: Yes I still uphold to China having the most advanced and extensive HSR line in the world. They have the fastest trains and the newest technology, as well as the largest network. Although, I do not know how they compare in numbers of HSR stations. Maybe that&#8217;s what you mean.<br />
&#8220;China, for example, has the world’s largest high speed rail network at just over 3,728 miles (6,000 km)&#8230; Prior to China’s construction of new high speed rail lines in 2007, Japan had the world’s largest high speed train network at 1,528 mi (2,459 km).&#8221; via <a href="http://geography.about.com/od/urbaneconomicgeography/a/highspeedtrains.htm" rel="nofollow">about.com</a><br />
And <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_speed_rail#High-speed_railways_by_region" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> shows they have 6,552 miles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knut</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-217261</link>
		<dc:creator>Knut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-217261</guid>
		<description>Bridgette, my guess is that it is because they did extensively in the past. China&#039;s government accept more and more copyrights and they are starting to sue Chinese companies for copying technology and it really was about time. I know a lot stories about European companies bringing their productions to China. After a while all of their production processes where copied and the companies went bankrupt, because a production next door offer the same products for half of the price, because they didn&#039;t need to spend money on research, product development and so on by just stealing patents. This was a very serious problem and is slowly turning into the other direction.

Concerning HSR I&#039;m with you: Let the project start! It&#039;s a bit like with the limited editions from Ferrari, Porsche or Mercedes AMG. The so called “early adopters” always has to spend more money on it. After it went main street and the technologies find access to mass production the prices come down dramatically. We have seen this with the ICE. In the early stage the tickets were as expensive than a Lufthansa tickets. Nowadays they are still a bit more expensive then regular train tickets, but therefore you are double or triple as fast from A to B. Within Germany only the flights from the North to the South end can compete, for all the other routes the ICE is much faster with a top speed of around 300 km/h (it’s around 180 mph) and because they go from city centre to city centre, while the airports are located outside the cities. The Transrapid (it’s a monorail system) is even faster. It’s cost effective, environmental friendly and over the time the prices will be the same then for the regular trains. The good point on top is that our complete rail system got an overhaul step by step so that also the regular trains got an upgrade. I’m still concerned how it should work at the UK, because only the link (EuroTunnel) between London and Paris is a high speed link. The rest of the rail system is still 1900. Well, over all a very ambitioned project. I like the idea to jump on a train to St. Petersburg and to visit an exhibition at the Eremitage after a 6 to 8 hours train ride or to spend some time on a train with friends to Beijing to have a noodle soup and directly go back. There is a song which says “Let’s go with a Taxi to Paris just for one day”. The remake should be named “Let’s go with the ICE to Beijing just for one day!” ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bridgette, my guess is that it is because they did extensively in the past. China&#8217;s government accept more and more copyrights and they are starting to sue Chinese companies for copying technology and it really was about time. I know a lot stories about European companies bringing their productions to China. After a while all of their production processes where copied and the companies went bankrupt, because a production next door offer the same products for half of the price, because they didn&#8217;t need to spend money on research, product development and so on by just stealing patents. This was a very serious problem and is slowly turning into the other direction.</p>
<p>Concerning HSR I&#8217;m with you: Let the project start! It&#8217;s a bit like with the limited editions from Ferrari, Porsche or Mercedes AMG. The so called “early adopters” always has to spend more money on it. After it went main street and the technologies find access to mass production the prices come down dramatically. We have seen this with the ICE. In the early stage the tickets were as expensive than a Lufthansa tickets. Nowadays they are still a bit more expensive then regular train tickets, but therefore you are double or triple as fast from A to B. Within Germany only the flights from the North to the South end can compete, for all the other routes the ICE is much faster with a top speed of around 300 km/h (it’s around 180 mph) and because they go from city centre to city centre, while the airports are located outside the cities. The Transrapid (it’s a monorail system) is even faster. It’s cost effective, environmental friendly and over the time the prices will be the same then for the regular trains. The good point on top is that our complete rail system got an overhaul step by step so that also the regular trains got an upgrade. I’m still concerned how it should work at the UK, because only the link (EuroTunnel) between London and Paris is a high speed link. The rest of the rail system is still 1900. Well, over all a very ambitioned project. I like the idea to jump on a train to St. Petersburg and to visit an exhibition at the Eremitage after a 6 to 8 hours train ride or to spend some time on a train with friends to Beijing to have a noodle soup and directly go back. There is a song which says “Let’s go with a Taxi to Paris just for one day”. The remake should be named “Let’s go with the ICE to Beijing just for one day!” <img src='http://inhabitat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridgette Meinhold</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/china-to-connect-its-high-speed-rail-all-the-way-to-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-217224</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridgette Meinhold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94629#comment-217224</guid>
		<description>Why are so many people concerned that China is copying or stealing technology? I say, spend the money on building the system rather than on reinventing the wheel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are so many people concerned that China is copying or stealing technology? I say, spend the money on building the system rather than on reinventing the wheel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
