Comments on: Chinese Train Smashes World Record for High Speed Rail Travel

By: Guy Average

Guy Average — Fri, 03 Dec 2010 07:27:42 +0000

The train is fast, no doubt. Is it really Green? The Chinese are notorious for ignoring environmental standards. The article doesn’t say what powers this train, but if it is electric, the electricity in China is primarily coal-fired (by a large majority), although there is hydro and nuclear in that order. No emissions standards at all in China, for the most part.

By: THW

THW — Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:02:07 +0000

The TGV train hitting 574 kph was a prototype train stuffed with testing equipment. The passangers were only technicians, reporters and some VIPs. A lot of things were build in and tested prior to the release in the new Alstom HS train AGV. Above that a lot of research was done for a better understanding of very high speed trains in general.
Besides that not only the train was a protoype also the track was specifically set up such as higher tension on the catinary line and others.
So far the speed record for a regular train set designed for daily operation on a regular high speed line was done by a Velaro train from Siemens in Spain going 404 kph.
Therefore the speed record here of 415 kph has to be seen as a follow up of the Spanish record. It is a world record for off the stock train sets on high speed tracks.
Anyway, it deserves highest respect to the Chinese to come up with such a record. If considering the short time since they entered the high speed market even though supported by a major share of forreign knowledge they have done it. We can be sure there is more to come.
It wouldn’t be surprising if they even breake the French record not too far from now.

By: New Oslo Train Station Features Massive Rooftop Park | Inhabitat - Green Design Will Save the World

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:46:23 +0000

[...] restaurants, offices, art and performance spaces, a rooftop park, and of course, a place to grab a train make up the master plan, which can change as needs and demand [...]

By: 200MPH Bullet Trains to Connect Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam | Inhabitat - Green Design Will Save the World

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:45:39 +0000

[...] and it could be ready within three years. This marks the first time that there will be direct rail service from London to [...]

By: psmisc

psmisc — Tue, 05 Oct 2010 03:52:13 +0000

I think what the article meant was that high speed rail = dedicated tracks, while conventional rail = old tracks + tilted trains.

TGVs are tilted trains that run on “conventional” tracks designed for much lower speed. Slow tracks have much sharper turns. To prevent people from being thrown off their seats, the trains automatically tilt during turns.

This train on the other hand runs on dedicated tracks designed from the ground up for high speed, mainly for safety reasons. Though it’s a much more costly solution.

By: dreamerman

dreamerman — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:19:10 +0000

What a beautiful train! I’d pay 8 bucks more just to SEE it! Heheh. Didnt i hear something a while back about a crazy project to build a new bullet train line to connect china with london? Probably just a proposal, but what a fantastic journey that would be if it happened! I somehow doubt that would cost just $15 though. Incidentally – $15 may be expensive for china but that’s still less than a quarter the cost of a first class ticket on the new high speed line in england that i travel on. And that is just a 60 mile trip or so.

By: stefan_

stefan_ — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:09:36 +0000

The 574 km/h TGV was a one time run. Max speed on regular sevice is 320 km/h, average speed being lower.

By: ptitol

ptitol — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 06:37:32 +0000

I’m a bit skeptical this means of transportation is so green after all. I repeatedly read/heard that one of the reasons for the TGV, ICE or Shinkansen not exceeding 300-350kph or so is the extra energy required. This train might boast some special aerodynamic features but somehow I doubt it (no particular ground for doubting except other companies producing high speed trains did not come up with fantastic solutions just yet – again I can be wrong)
Anyhow, I guess we will see very quickly after opening if the trains hit up the maximum speed or the operator decides otherwise.

By: bbriann

bbriann — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:53:13 +0000

high speed trains in japan and europe can go faster than this train on trial runs.

they don’t go this fast regularly because they have high safety standards – maybe being too cautious? but a common complaint of chinese rail system is 1. they copy foreign technology and 2. they lack the safety standards that most other countries with hsr have.

this article is misleading because of this fact.

By: Anonymous___

Anonymous___ — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 03:59:56 +0000

Sounds like someone’s confusing:
* “conventional rail” vs non-conventional (i.e. maglev)
* “commercial operation” vs a trial run

By: munford

munford — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 01:57:12 +0000

I guess this is breaking the record for commercial operating high speed train. French TGV is a testing run record.

By: Deeksie

Deeksie — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:11:20 +0000

The record for the TGV was done on a trial run, as in, I don’t think it had any carriages. But this high speed train will be hitting it’s top speed on regular passenger journeys.

If that’s right…the post didn’t make that clear at all.

By: Mr. Green

Mr. Green — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:58:23 +0000

It does sound strange that a “stock” high Speed Rail train is slower than a so-called “conventional rail” train. The French TGV that set the record at 574 kph is not a regular “stock” train. It was a juiced up train designed to set a speed record. It was able to achieve this record speed for a short duration. No “stock” French TGV in regular service can achieve this record speed. The recent HSR train that set the HSR record at 415 kph is a “stock” train like another other HSR train servicing passengers on this line. The article should have explained the background a little better so people won’t be confused.

By: Eletruk

Eletruk — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:17:57 +0000

Something doesn’t sound right. The speed record for high speed rail is LOWER than the speed for conventional rail? I guess I don’t understand how TGV (“With Great Speed”) doesn’t qualify as high speed rail.