Gallery: City of San Francisco to Stop Buying Mac Products After Apple ...

 

When the news broke that Apple removed all 39 of its certified desktop computers, laptops and monitors from the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT)‘s list of green electronics, many predicted that the move would likely cost the computer giant some business. Now, just days after the announcement, San Francisco officials have revealed that the city plans to suspend its purchases of Apple computers. San Francisco is the first municipality to announce that it will seek to block purchases of Apple products by government agencies, but it probably won’t be the last.

Earlier this week the San Francisco Department of Environment told the Wall Street Journal that it will inform the roughly 28,000 employees at 50 city agencies that they’ll no longer be able to buy Apple laptops and desktop computers with city funds. San Francisco officials made the ruling in direct response to Apple’s decision to remove its products from EPEAT registry, a green electronics certification that requires manufacturers to make computers and other products that are easy to disassemble and recycle.

The move could cause Apple to lose a lot more business, because many municipalities and large institutions depend on the EPEAT list when deciding what types of machines to purchase. According to the Washington Post, the University of California—one of California’s biggest employers, and one of the largest public university systems in the country—is currently weighing wether or not to stop purchasing Apple computers.

Apple’s move to remove its products from the EPEAT registry is still surrounded by mystery, especially when one considers that Apple was one of the companies that helped to create the standards. And as the WSJ notes, even though the company no longer certifies its products through EPEAT, Apple still has a better environmental record than many tech companies. Apple offers its own recycling programs and issue annual environmental impact reports, and speaking to the Post, Apple spokesperson Kristin Huguet claimed that its products “are superior in other important environmental areas not measured by EPEAT, such as removal of toxic materials.”

Via CIO Journal and The Washington Post

Photos © Apple and Bernard Gagnon

LEAVE A COMMENT

or your inhabitat account below

Let's make sure you're a real person:


2 Comments

  1. bthinker bthinker July 12, 2012 at 8:29 pm

    got* criteria* an Iphone* damn labtop keyboards.. If I myself wasn’t attempting efficiency on an IvyBridge Lab maybe I wouldn’t have biffed it so hard.

  2. bthinker bthinker July 12, 2012 at 8:25 pm

    Apple just go tired of designing it’s product around crieria it itself helped create many years ago. Not just that but I’m sure the certifications and the inspections cost money. As none of there certifications are any more than a stamp of approval from a watchdog as big as apple has become they threw them the bird. I personally only own as Iphone as far as apple goes, but they are usually more of the efficient end of the CPU/GPU market anyways. I guess san frans hipsters threw a fit over this not realizing it changes nothing about current products but only those under creation. Big decissions, small brains, happens a lot lately/always.

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
What are you looking for? (Solar, HVAC, etc.)
Where are you located?