Egregious Packaging Hall of Shame: Styrofoam

by , 10/26/10

sustainable design, green design, packaging the future, green packaging, styrofoam, environmental design, biodegradable packagingPhoto © David Gilford

Styrofoam is one of the world’s most environmentally unsound packaging materials – not only does it stick around in the environment forever (I’ll never forget swimming around a beautiful fresh-water lagoon in the DR, picking up tiny bits of foam that had found their way there), it’s super toxic to produce, clogs animal digestive tracks, contributes to ozone depletion, it’s made from non-renewable petroleum, and it leaches chemicals into food, especially if microwaved; and that’s not all! Fortunately, there’s a handful of innovative companies who are kicking the material to the curb – read on to learn about some inspired alternatives to the styrofoam scourge!

sustainable design, green design, packaging the future, green packaging, styrofoam, environmental design, biodegradable packagingPhoto © Kinerific

When writing, researching, and generally being nosy about the whys of sustainable (or supposedly sustainable) products and their associated packaging, once in a while I run up against the absolutist argument. It goes like this: I am asking (many, many) questions of a person who has many years of experience in a certain industry, and when I ask them why they are knowingly continuing a practice that’s unsustainable, they say, “Because there’s no other way to keep it cold/keep it from breaking/preserve it/meet our bottom line demands.” And then they look me in the eye and say something (condescendingly) like “It wouldn’t be very eco-friendly if we had to make twice as many cause half of them broke/rotted/melted, would it?” Reporters just love rhetorical questions, don’t you?

This absolutist argument comes from the mindset that the way something has been done is always the way it should be done (ie. it would take too much time, trouble and possibly some creativity to come up with a better solution). It is the excuse I’ve most heard for the continued use of styrofoam, for example. And it just ain’t true. One of the places I’ve continually heard that styrofoam can’t be replaced is in packaging for computers and electronics, and furniture. These items become worthless, or nearly so, if even minorly chipped or broken.

Related Posts


or your inhabitat account below


  1. Cristian Buoro March 18, 2015 at 1:32 pm

    polystyrene is dirty but it does not pollute
    cardboard dirty but not pollute

    example fill two glasses of water, put 1 cup piece polystyrene glass 2 piece of cardboard

    after 2 weeks 1 glass but still polystyrene drinking water glass 2 cardboard dissolve non-potable water

    preferie dirty and clean or dirty and die?

  2. Heather Cyrus October 30, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    Thank you for writing about such good news! A key aspect to the loop of green design must be the “marketing.” For the future health of our planet, it is essential that products be designed in a green manner AND implemented by a wide range and far-reaching business sector. There is a big movement for businesses to become increasingly “eco-friendly,” yet many individuals don’t know where to turn for solutions- they don’t know that alternatives exist, and that must change For every organization that adopts sustainable practices, it’s imperative we see 10 more follow suit.

  3. Egregious Packaging Hal... October 30, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    […] READ MORE> 0 email thisemail facebookfacebook diggdigg tweetmeme_url = ""; tweetmeme_style = "compact"; […]

  4. sita12 October 26, 2010 at 11:57 am

    packaging can be compostable! check out this biodegradable packaging made from mushrooms made by my friends over at ecovative design!

  • Read Inhabitat

  • Search Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Browse by Keyword

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home