<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flaw in EU Offshore Turbines Makes Them Slide Off Their Bases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/flaw-in-eu-offshore-turbines-makes-them-slide-off-their-bases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/flaw-in-eu-offshore-turbines-makes-them-slide-off-their-bases/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hop</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/flaw-in-eu-offshore-turbines-makes-them-slide-off-their-bases/comment-page-1/#comment-221651</link>
		<dc:creator>hop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=111614#comment-221651</guid>
		<description>Are you serious? How is this a story?

This article implies that somehow a fuckup in the mixture of the concrete for the bases of the windmills puts the turbines themselves in a questionable light. Really?

Even with a naive back-of-the-envelope calculation of the numbers within this very article, it doesn&#039;t make sense:

Britain alone is investing 150 billion dollars within the next 10 years, yet a maybe-6-months retrofit that may cost Europe as a whole 20 million carries a &quot;mighty hefty price tag?&quot; One sum is .0133 _percent_ of the other, for crying out loud! Seriously?

Quote the referenced article &quot;[...] and may not even require action [...]&quot;

Nothing to report, move along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you serious? How is this a story?</p>
<p>This article implies that somehow a fuckup in the mixture of the concrete for the bases of the windmills puts the turbines themselves in a questionable light. Really?</p>
<p>Even with a naive back-of-the-envelope calculation of the numbers within this very article, it doesn&#8217;t make sense:</p>
<p>Britain alone is investing 150 billion dollars within the next 10 years, yet a maybe-6-months retrofit that may cost Europe as a whole 20 million carries a &#8220;mighty hefty price tag?&#8221; One sum is .0133 _percent_ of the other, for crying out loud! Seriously?</p>
<p>Quote the referenced article &#8220;[...] and may not even require action [...]&#8221;</p>
<p>Nothing to report, move along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
