<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Smartphone Applications Can Consume 75% More Energy than Paid Versions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/free-smartphone-applications-can-consume-75-of-your-battery-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/free-smartphone-applications-can-consume-75-of-your-battery-life/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericwthom</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/free-smartphone-applications-can-consume-75-of-your-battery-life/comment-page-1/#comment-378408</link>
		<dc:creator>ericwthom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=364692#comment-378408</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, but where does this leave us, poor battery-starved smartphone users?  Did they compare the ad-supported apps to the paid versions?  Would using paid apps save battery life over the ad-supported versions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, but where does this leave us, poor battery-starved smartphone users?  Did they compare the ad-supported apps to the paid versions?  Would using paid apps save battery life over the ad-supported versions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
