Comments on: MILAN 2007: BREEZE SIDE TABLE by SWEDESE http://inhabitat.com/from-milan-breeze-side-table-by-swedese/ Green design & eco innovation for a better world Sat, 25 May 2013 19:09:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Richie http://inhabitat.com/from-milan-breeze-side-table-by-swedese/comment-page-1/#comment-43945 Richie Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:53:13 +0000 http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/21/from-milan-breeze-side-table-by-swedese/#comment-43945 As I see it, Swedish Modern has always been about an intuitive sense of classic proportions and understated elegance. This approach has enabled Swedish Modern furniture to transcend the limitations of seasonal style, and therefore to be continhously relevant, or 'in style', since its inception decades ago. The problem with this table, for me, is that it 'breaks ranks' with this approach. The ripple of the wood surface of this Swedese side table seems to break the golden rules of Swedish Modern design. Maybe that's a good thing ? Maybe not ? So is it still 'Swedish Modern' or it something else ? I think that the dining table and chairs in the last photo are more exemplary of what has always defined Swedish Modern design. Maybe the groupings subtle use of bolder color, as well as the chairs not being all of the same color, or style, is part of the subtle 'updating' their classic approach ? However, the chairs do seem a bit squeezed together in order to accomodate the usable space allowed by the diagonal table legs... which seemingly exemplifies 'style' over 'substance'... which has never before, to my knowledge, characterized Swedish Design ? As I see it, Swedish Modern has always been about an intuitive sense of classic proportions and understated elegance. This approach has enabled Swedish Modern furniture to transcend the limitations of seasonal style, and therefore to be continhously relevant, or ‘in style’, since its inception decades ago. The problem with this table, for me, is that it ‘breaks ranks’ with this approach. The ripple of the wood surface of this Swedese side table seems to break the golden rules of Swedish Modern design. Maybe that’s a good thing ? Maybe not ? So is it still ‘Swedish Modern’ or it something else ?

I think that the dining table and chairs in the last photo are more exemplary of what has always defined Swedish Modern design. Maybe the groupings subtle use of bolder color, as well as the chairs not being all of the same color, or style, is part of the subtle ‘updating’ their classic approach ?

However, the chairs do seem a bit squeezed together in order to accomodate the usable space allowed by the diagonal table legs… which seemingly exemplifies ‘style’ over ‘substance’… which has never before, to my knowledge, characterized Swedish Design ?

]]>