<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Investigating Obama&#8217;s New Fuel Economy Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/gop-investigating-obamas-new-fuel-economy-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/gop-investigating-obamas-new-fuel-economy-rules/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarketom</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/gop-investigating-obamas-new-fuel-economy-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-349543</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarketom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=283581#comment-349543</guid>
		<description>@caeman 
Well said! But, you know as well as I the ridiculous bias this site has. Journalistic integrity is non-existent, only liberal dogma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@caeman<br />
Well said! But, you know as well as I the ridiculous bias this site has. Journalistic integrity is non-existent, only liberal dogma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FastDog</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/gop-investigating-obamas-new-fuel-economy-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-348159</link>
		<dc:creator>FastDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=283581#comment-348159</guid>
		<description>So the auto makers are going to produce more efficient vehicles, these rules offer no guarantee that they will be bought, will reduce the countries fuel consumption, or save anyone any money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the auto makers are going to produce more efficient vehicles, these rules offer no guarantee that they will be bought, will reduce the countries fuel consumption, or save anyone any money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caeman</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/gop-investigating-obamas-new-fuel-economy-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-348150</link>
		<dc:creator>caeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=283581#comment-348150</guid>
		<description>The important question is:  Did Obama break the law in how he met with the automakers?  Sure, to ahead and make political cracks on this site&#039;s readership and display your bias.  But you gloss over the very question that is being asked:  Did Obama break the law.

There was much crying and gnashing of teeth when Bush did things behind closed doors.  Obama promised transparency and several days for public comments before any new laws would be passed.  He broke that promise, but that I guess its okay if is serves one&#039;s narrow-minded purpose?

I like to read this site for the informative green technologies, things that genuinely help the world.  But, your political commentary is sadly lacking in journalistic integrity and consistency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important question is:  Did Obama break the law in how he met with the automakers?  Sure, to ahead and make political cracks on this site&#8217;s readership and display your bias.  But you gloss over the very question that is being asked:  Did Obama break the law.</p>
<p>There was much crying and gnashing of teeth when Bush did things behind closed doors.  Obama promised transparency and several days for public comments before any new laws would be passed.  He broke that promise, but that I guess its okay if is serves one&#8217;s narrow-minded purpose?</p>
<p>I like to read this site for the informative green technologies, things that genuinely help the world.  But, your political commentary is sadly lacking in journalistic integrity and consistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
