Tafline Laylin

Grand Canyon Uranium Mine as Big as a Walmart Parking Lot to Proceed Despite Obama Ban

by , 05/01/13

Energy Fuels Resources, Grand Canyon, seven natural wonders of the world, Havasupai, Grand Canyon Trust, uranium, environmental destruction, Red Wall Aquifer, South Rim of Grand Canyon, news, environment, nature, travel, US Forest ServiceGrand Canyon photo from Shutterstock

A Canadian company has received federal approval to proceed with a uranium mine near the Grand Canyon despite a ban put in place by President Obama last year. Energy Fuels Resources has skirted the ban by producing a 1986 environmental report conducted by the United States Forest Service, The Guardian reports, but several conservation groups and the Havasupai tribe have dismissed the report as being outdated. The mine will clearcut a stretch of land as large as a Walmart parking lot just six miles from the South Rim entrance to the Grand Canyon, which is up to 70 million years old.


Energy Fuels Resources, Grand Canyon, seven natural wonders of the world, Havasupai, Grand Canyon Trust, uranium, environmental destruction, Red Wall Aquifer, South Rim of Grand Canyon, news, environment, nature, travel, US Forest ServicePhoto via Shutterstock

Roger Clark, a Grand Canyon Trust director, told The Guardian that despite claims from Energy Fuels Resources that the uranium mine is tiny, it will include the parking lot-sized mine, two mine shafts, a tailing pond and a metal building. “That’s a fairly impressive imposition on an otherwise undisturbed landscape,” said Clark.

The Canadian company also claimed that uranium occurs naturally and therefore poses no threat, but Clark notes that radioactive properties only occur once the uranium is exposed to air and water. Then it releases radon gas, which was not regulated when the US Forest Service conducted the 1986 study. He also warned that the mine threatens the most important source of water aside from the Colorado River – the Red Wall Aquifer.

“Once that aquifer is contaminated, there’s no turning back.”

Via The Guardian

Related Posts

LEAVE A COMMENT

or your inhabitat account below

Let's make sure you're a real person:


2 Comments

  1. mmmorgan May 1, 2013 at 10:24 am

    So what can we do about it? No website or twitter hashtag to spread our disapproval? What is the point of the article if there is no actionable step?

  • Read Inhabitat

  • Search Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Browse by Keyword

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home