Don’t count on Scott Pruitt, head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, to do much environmental protecting. Weeks after rejecting scientific consensus about the role of carbon dioxide in driving global warming, the nation’s top environmental official doubled down on Sunday by describing a landmark accord to curb the planet’s industrial emissions as a “bad deal” for the United States. “You know, what was wrong with Paris was not just that it was, you know, failed to be treated as a treaty, but China and India, the largest producers of CO2 internationally, got away scot-free. They didn’t have to take steps until 2030,” Pruitt said in an interview with ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos. “So we’ve penalized ourselves through lost jobs while China and India didn’t take steps to address the issue internationally. So Paris was just a bad deal, in my estimation.”

Scott Pruitt, Donald Trump, EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Paris Climate Agreement, Paris Climate Accord, climate change, environment, global warming

There’s plenty to nitpick about Pruitt’s stance, which mischaracterizes the positions of China and India, both of which officially ratified the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change in late 2016.

For one thing, China is the world’s No. 1 polluter, but India comes in fourth after the United States and European Union.

Neither does the 2030 cutoff give China or India special latitude. All 197 countries that have committed themselves to the pact are legally bound to develop plans to curtail greenhouse-gas emissions through 2025 or 2030. And while there’s no legal requirement that specifies how much countries should cut, they must report every two years on their efforts to mitigate emissions levels, which are subject to technical and peer review.

Related: EPA chief says carbon dioxide is not a ‘primary contributor’ to global warming

Far from getting away “scot-free,” China and India are making inroads in their energy policies. Although it continues to be bogged down by inefficient coal power plants that contribute to its infamous smog, China has been expanding its renewable-energy capacity at a breakneck pace.

Even as President Donald Trump decried climate change as a “Chinese hoax,” the Chinese government announced that it intends to spend more than $360 billion through 2020 on renewable power sources like solar and wind, slashing carbon emissions and creating over 13 million jobs in the renewable energy sector in the same time frame.

Scott Pruitt, Donald Trump, EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Paris Climate Agreement, Paris Climate Accord, climate change, environment, global warming

India, in the meantime, has pledged to obtain at least 40 percent of its electricity from non-fossil-fuel sources by 2030. To nudge itself closer to that goal, the South Asian nation is planning 33 solar parks in 21 states, with a capacity of at least 500 megawatts each—no mean feat for a country where millions still have no access to electricity.

Indeed India currently houses the world’s largest solar power plant in a single location, a title once held by Topaz Solar Farm in California.

For anyone who has been paying attention, however, Pruitt’s statements shouldn’t be too surprising. The former attorney general of Oklahoma has long boasted close ties to the oil and gas industry. He also sued the EPA—the very same agency he now heads—a stunning 14 times, frequently in tandem with companies that donated money to campaigns he was affiliated to.

Related: New EPA chief Scott Pruitt’s emails reveal troubling oil-industry ties

Pruitt noted on Sunday that President Trump will soon be signing a new executive order that will halt the implementation of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan, an Obama administration policy designed to, among other things, rein in America’s greenhouse gas emissions by 32 percent by 2030.

“With respect to this executive order that’s coming out on Tuesday, this is about making sure that we have a pro-growth and pro-environment approach to how we do regulation in this country,” Pruitt said.

Pro-growth? Debatable. Pro-environment? Not a chance.

+ ABC News

Via Huffington Post

Photos from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency