Site Meter
Molly Cotter

Laser Power Systems is Developing Cars Fueled by Nuclear Power

by , 09/04/11
filed under: Green Transportation, News

thorium, nuclear power, thorium laser, nuclear powered car, electric car, Laser Power Systems, laser powered

There may finally be a way to power your car forever — the only catch is that the fuel would be radioactive. Charles Stevens of Laser Power Systems (LPS) is working on creating an emissions free turbine/electric generator powered by nuclear thorium lasers. Though thorium is gaining a reputation as the “safe” nuclear element, with all the recent controversy surrounding nuclear power, we at Inhabitat wonder if it’s worth the risk.

Related Posts

9 Responses to “Laser Power Systems is Developing Cars Fueled by Nuclear Power”

  1. youareme7 youareme7 (@youareme7) says:

    I’ve been a regular reader of Inhabitat for a pretty darn long time and this is the first post I’ve read that has truly disappointed me. I know that in order to be “green” doesn’t require any pragmatism toward the real world but just because you see the word “nuclear” doesn’t necessarily equate with “evil”. Thorium is uniquely suited to be a truly disruptive power technology that could actually replace base load power (something most renewables can’t do) that is currently run mostly by nasty coal plants and to a lesser extent shady natural gas plants. Thus far I’ve found Inhabitat to be run by people that are not only green, but also cognizant of how the world actually works. I quit reading TreeHugger because they degraded into “dumb hippies”, hopefully this article is an unfortunate judgement as opposed to a new philosophy.
    I do really love your site, I just happen to be a pretty big enthusiast for Thorium and this pushed my buttons.

  2. Calvin K Calvin K says:

    oh definitely! I have always loath cars for their inefficient ways of converting energy for use (there are only so many ways you can combust fuels, and all of them waste most of the released energy). This shall be a huge improvements.
    Although the political and economical possibilities of this tech might prove more interesting.
    Finally….
    “…developments were never truly carried out with it mainly because of its inability to be weaponized” — ouch!

  3. mycrow mycrow says:

    @youareme7, please look into the Precautionary Principle.

  4. _alex_ _Alex_ says:

    @mycrow, doesn’t that principle relate only to people in positions of power, with a total inability to understand the subject matter..?? Personally i’ve always thought that decisions shouldn’t be made until you are fully aware of the facts, and this principle makes it possible (for authorities) to make decisions without the facts, or even the necessary reasoning to comprehend the argument. I’m all for keeping the general populous from harm, but if the person in-charge isn’t capable then they shouldn’t be in-charge.. Just my opinion.

  5. jesuguru jesuguru says:

    If one gram = 7500 gallons of gasoline, and eight grams = 300000 miles, then that assumes 5 MPG (7500 gallons = 37500 miles per gram). Unimpressive stat for a potentially impressive technology.

  6. sttraveler sttraveler says:

    @jesuguru
    while 5mpg may not seem like an impressive number look at the long term effect of the technology. The average passanger vehicle in US has an mpg rateing of 33.7 in 2010. That means 300,000 miles equals 8902 gallons of gas. One gallon of gas emits approximately 20 pounds of carbon emissions which means that those 300,000 miles would be 89 tons of carbon emissions which could be eliminated by 8 grams of Thorium.

  7. marcopolo marcopolo (@mimi1003) says:

    This is an interesting article with a very impressive technology. Sorry youareme7 have have to disagree with your scathing comments on the article as there is something fundamentally wrong with driving around in a sportscar loaded with radioactive material – every car becomes a dirty bomb in an accident.
    That said it seems to me that this nuclear technology is a superior alternative to nuclear technology that can be use to weaponise nuclear material.
    M

  8. _alex_ _alex_ says:

    @marcopolo
    Since there is nothing combustive in a Thorium powered car, it’s hard to see how it could be come a ‘dirty bomb’..?? The type of radiation it gives off isn’t what most people should be afraid of. I’d say there’s something fundamentally wrong with driving a car loaded with an extremely explosive material like petrol, which in the case of an accident is very likely to cause far more death and destruction, though for some reason we ignore that fact every time we drive. We’ve rationalised driving a bomb in one form, why not in another?? Even the materials used in hybrids (batteries) have to be far more hazardous when they are burned. And looking at the bigger picture as ‘sttraveler’ suggests, the global and long term pro’s of such a device far out-weigh the cons.

  9. marcopolo marcopolo says:

    _Alex_
    Jump off the Empire State Building with a backpack full of thorium contaminated baby powder and you become a (not very effective) ‘human dirty bomb’ dispersing radioactive material. Crashing your Cadillac WTF at speed would most probably spread some radioactive material. Smashing your Cadillac WTF into the back of a petrol tanker might be more effective, sure, but the principle’s the same. Thorium has a half like of 14 billion years. Most of it leaves the body pretty quickly but part can end up in bone and can cause cancer (bone, pancreas).
    Setting fire to a hybrid will produce some nasty stuff, but those pollutants and toxins won’t hang about for 14 000 000 000 years

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

Add your comments

NEW USER

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
What are you looking for? (Solar, HVAC, etc.)
Where are you located?