Gallery: Massive Hunters Point Shipyard Brownfield Project Primed to Se...


The seven-mile-per-side square of land that is San Francisco, densely settled for decades with precious little to spare in the way of developable land, is poised to embark upon one of the country’s most ambitious brownfield redevelopment initiatives. The Hunters Point Naval Shipyard arose as a location of bustling shipbuilding activity in 1941 as the U.S. became engaged in World War II but has sat idle since 1974. The city’s redevelopment plan calls for the transformation of a toxic, abandoned 700-plus acre parcel into thousands of housing units and businesses that will be powered by clean energy, while integrating the area into the ecologically significant San Francisco Bay.

Read the rest of this entry »


or your inhabitat account below


  1. David Bois July 28, 2011 at 11:27 pm

    I’ll offer up the observation that it’s increasingly the people who teach in San Francisco’s public schools, who work to maintain public safety, who tend to its parks and public spaces that are among those priced out of the housing market in the city they serve.

    I don’t share your fear of damage to property values. For starters, this is San Francisco. Property will always be dear. And in particular, this specific (south east) part of the city has suffered real neglect. Property values here have pretty much nowhere to go but up. So one of the real challenges that this redevelopment will face is embracing the opportunity to reimagine and realize a community’s infrastructure in which active pride can be taken, and with luck sustained, while not gilding it to the point where those who have for long toughed it out are forced to leave it.

    I’d be happy without apology to see my tax money help support community diversity; it’s a far more meritorious use of public resources imho, as compared to, oh, say the billions in subsidies we’re forking over to oil companies who are currently enjoying record profits. Ymmv.

  2. caeman July 27, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    Below market level to encourage socioeconomic diversity? So…the tax payers are going to foot the bill for someone that cannot a home anywhere else in SF, to live in SF, in a place that if market force were allowed to play, the city could easily profit from its investment? This will negatively harm the resell value of homes and apartment all over SF.

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home