Site Meter
Brit Liggett

Michele Bachmann and Fellow Republicans Throw Weight into “Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act”

by , 07/12/11

bachmann, michele bachmann, representative michele bachmann, light bulb freedom of choice act, Better Use of Light Bulb Act, incandescent light bulbs, compact fluorescent light bulbs, energy efficient light bulbs, low energy light bulbs, energy act, renewable energy, green energy, clean energy, saving energy

Republicans in the House of Representatives – in the midst of attempting to raise the debt ceiling and balance our budget – have decided to take on what some are calling the “Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act”. Partially spearheaded by Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, a Republican candidate for President, the initiative is working to repeal the section of the 2007 Energy Act signed by George W. Bush that mandates energy efficiency standards for light bulbs starting next year. Voting on the decision, dubbed BULB, was supposed to happen yesterday but according to the House of Representatives’ minutes, it was postponed. Surely this came as sad news for Bachmann who has been crusading against this section of the Energy Act since 2008. Oh and did we mention that if Bachmann is unsuccessful and the section is left in place, it could save Americans $12.5 billion a year? Yeah.

Related Posts

3 Responses to “Michele Bachmann and Fellow Republicans Throw Weight into “Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act””

  1. helderluis helderluis says:

    Maybe you should do some research on the EMF those supposedly green light bulbs emit… and don’t get me started on the mercury and other dangerous chemical used in factories to produce them.

  2. sammael sammael says:

    They are not greener, they are more energy efficient.
    They are not a perfect solution, they are transitory solution. As prices of LED bulbs fall, they will overtake the market.
    LED is THE green solution, higher quality of light, use less energy and is by far longest lasting.
    It is also quite expensive and new. In few years of technology diffusion and market expansion, it shouldn’t be any more expensive then today’s bulbs. But if this act gets repealed, then pressure to develop those technologies lessens, people don’t have to buy new technologies so market is smaller, which also lowers the profit margines, thus slowing the emergance of the new technology even more.
    If Bachmann has her way, we will be that much farther from cheap, efficient, ecological light, that can in long run save us all billions, and lower our dependance on polluting energy producers. I call that a huge loss.

  3. maw maw says:

    and don’t get me started on the mercury and other dangerous chemicals that comes from currently producing much of the electricity needed for light bulbs in the US, coal power plants.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

Add your comments

NEW USER

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
What are you looking for? (Solar, HVAC, etc.)
Where are you located?