NASA Confirms “Impossible” Propellant-free Microwave Thruster for Spacecraft Works!

by , 08/30/14

Designs for a device called a microwave thruster, which could power spacecraft without the need for propellant, have been proposed since 2006. While the engine follows the principles of relativity theory in converting electrical energy into force to produce thrust, it has been dismissed as impossible in practice since it defies the law of conservation of momentum. But a team from NASA has just successfully trialled their own version of the engine, which changes everything.

Several years ago British scientist Roger Shawyer presented his EmDrive microwave thruster engine to the scientific community. It used microwaves bounced off reflectors in a sealed container to produce small amounts of force and thereby achieve propulsion via propellant-free thrust. Its possibilities for long-distance spaceflight were extraordinary, but while it was groundbreaking there was one catch: it defied the law of conservation of momentum and was therefore deemed theoretically flawed. In 2012, scientists in China successfully repeated Shawyer’s development, but still most of the scientific community didn’t pay much attention to the results.

Related: MIT Developing Ionic Wind Thrusters as Efficient Alternative to Jet Engines

Now a team at NASA has tested the Cannae Drive developed by U.S. scientist Guido Fetta. It too is a microwave thruster and it was presented as a successful test at the recent 50th Joint Propulsion Conference in Cleveland, Ohio. The drive produced 30 to 50 micronewtons of thrust, which was decidedly less than the Chinese team’s reported 720 millinewtons or Shawyer’s 16 to 30 millinewtons. The NASA team’s report stated: “Test results indicate that the RF resonant cavity thruster design, which is unique as an electric propulsion device, is producing a force that is not attributable to any classical electromagnetic phenomenon and therefore is potentially demonstrating an interaction with the quantum vacuum virtual plasma.” I believe that translates as, “We are not entirely sure why, but it works.”

However, if like NASA we choose to focus on the results and not the method for the moment, what could be the implications of a microwave thruster-powered spacecraft? The device is so interesting because it does away with the need for lugging along a fuel supply that is about equivalent in weight to the craft it is propelling. Using solar energy to generate the power to create the microwaves in the first place becomes an option too. This would mean the engine could continue indefinitely, at least until mechanical failure brought it to a halt, though it would also limit the craft’s range to proximity to a source. For now, however, NASA’s development doesn’t even provide enough thrust to propel a peanut through space at a mission-acceptable speed, so there is still a way to go to scale up to a mission to Mars.


+ EmDrive

Via Engadget and Wired

Photos by EmDrive and NASA via Wikimedia Commons

Related Posts


or your inhabitat account below


  1. Frank Daniel March 21, 2015 at 1:00 am

    inductance and magnetism, is the next propellant

  2. Rob Williams March 20, 2015 at 11:36 am

    @Kenny you misquoted the author, she said could not propel a peanut ‘at a mission-acceptable speed.’ So instead of schooling her on her lack of scientific understanding, all you’ve managed to do here is show that you can’t read at a 3rd grade level.

    Furthermore, the construction ‘a journalist/they’re writing about’ is wrong, as the subject is singular.

    Listen, you’ll be much happier when you can balance your scientific genius with an elementary school ability to use the language, so quick, get to work!

  3. Adrian Lehman-Sizemore January 28, 2015 at 9:40 pm

    blows me away how insignificant people think this is and that science can now bypass combustion for momentum in space even in a testing and proofing stage is phenomenal! beside the secret space program is already in interstellar and dimensional space its still nothing in the scheme of things but maybe its something they are willing to let us have cause they dont know how to implement it…but in some garage somewhere some dude has developed a way to capture microwave energy using a microwave resonance reflector…maybe

  4. MarkmBha August 19, 2014 at 1:08 pm

    A possible solution for limited use.

  5. Emerson White August 12, 2014 at 5:05 am

    IF you “NASA confirms” you mean that “NASA does not confirm” then you are correct. It was an unreviewed conference paper. By applying more controls than previous papers had they found less thrust. However, they didn’t even test it in a vacuum. If the working unit produced a little extra heat than the control the air currents on the device would have produced that much thrust.

  6. Christian Jovetich August 9, 2014 at 12:20 pm

    We’re stuck in a peanuts gravitational field. Divert power from the blender!

  7. Skiltz1 August 5, 2014 at 8:48 pm

    Perhaps this device could, in the interim, be used to thrust peanuts from one end of the space cabin to another – that is of course, until it can actually propel the spacecraft itself.

  8. John Goethe August 5, 2014 at 7:32 pm

    How far away are we from using microwaves to propel our automobiles?

  9. Kenny Greenwald August 5, 2014 at 6:11 pm

    This is the worst article I’ve seen so far on this subject.

    “NASA’s development doesn’t even provide enough thrust to propel a peanut through space”
    ^^ This is an example of a journalist that doesn’t even attempt to understand the material they’re writing about.
    Any amount of force (no matter how insignificant) can always propel any amount of mass (no matter how large).
    Sure, it might take a lot longer, but this engine could thrust a peanut with ease. The engine, as it already stands, could be used to propel a typical space probe with no modifications.
    There’s no resistance in space!

  10. Jeremy Harris August 5, 2014 at 4:35 pm

    the results are promising yes, but they are pretty meaningless unless they can be independently reproduced and verified multiple times.

  11. Sean Groomes August 4, 2014 at 9:35 pm

    The name seems like a misnomer, even if it’s infinitesimally small it’s still creating something to push it forward.

  • Read Inhabitat

  • Search Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Browse by Keyword

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home