Site Meter
Brit Liggett

NASA to Spend $96 Million at Kennedy Space Center Cleaning Up the Toxic Fumes It Left Behind

by , 08/01/11

kennedy space center, nasa pollution, space shuttle pollution, space shuttle fumes, space shuttle emissions, nasa pollution, nasa programs, nasa launches, space shuttle launches, space travel emissions, clean space travel, sustainable space travel

NASA reports that the pollution caused by Space Shuttle launches at Kennedy Space Center in Florida will cost the government $96 million and will take 30 years to properly clean up. NASA officially ended the Space Shuttle Program on July 21st as the Space Shuttle Atlantis touched down for the final time at the Kennedy Space Center. It seems that the plumes of smoke resulting from the 135 shuttle launches caused toxic chemicals to seep into the sandy soil around the space center. In addition to the $96 million that will be spent at Kennedy, the Air Force announced they’ll be putting $50 million into cleaning up a similar mess at Cape Canaveral.

Related Posts

2 Responses to “NASA to Spend $96 Million at Kennedy Space Center Cleaning Up the Toxic Fumes It Left Behind”

  1. nightstalker nightstalker says:

    I am confused by this article.

    “It is estimated that 88,000 pounds of trichloroethylene soaked directly into the ground from 1959 to 1968. Apparently, during those years, workers simply poured the toxic substance straight into the ground after launches thinking it would evaporate.”

    None of that time frame was during the Shuttle ERA. This report is terrible.

  2. mrcynic mrCynic says:

    Hey nightstalker, don’t be clueless – bottom line is that there’s been extensive environmental damage done at KSC and adjoining CCAFS due to rocket processing and launching during *all* of the programs, and still is. I’ve worked at both places and know environmental engineers who’ve left in disgust at the arrogant “sweeping under the rug” that went on in the name of “progress”. Make no mistake, there’s been significant government-approved environmental damage done here, and on a national wildlife refuge to boot. Just outrageous.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

Add your comments

NEW USER

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
What are you looking for? (Solar, HVAC, etc.)
Where are you located?