Environmentalists have often criticized wind turbines on the grounds that they harm wildlife such as birds and bats who are caught in the blades. On the other hand, home owners have cited turbines as eye-sores that reduce the value of their property. Now, it appears that the wind turbine controversy is about to taken to a whole new level as researchers at Loughborough University in the UK announced that by painting turbines a different color, rather than the traditional white/grey, wildlife might not be affected. In short, they suggest that all turbines be painted purple.
Painting Wind Turbines Purple Will Save Wildlife
by Timon Singh, 11/02/10
filed under: Renewable Energy
Related Posts
-
Conventional wind turbine technology has been a bit out of reach for most residential consumers living in urban areas—until now. Researchers at Hong Kong
-
While many may knock giant wind turbines as eyesores, researchers from Ames National Laboratory and the University of Colorado have conducted a study that
-
http://www.vimeo.com/18956998 Francis Moon, a mechanical engineering professor at Cornell University, has designed a novel type of wind energy generator that vibrates in the wind rather than
4 Responses to “Painting Wind Turbines Purple Will Save Wildlife”
-
Featured Author
This Modified Desktop Computer Uses its Own Heat to Grow Plants
Solar Energy Generation Costs to Compete with Fossil Fuels by 2017
PG Tips Urges Britons to Recycle Teabags in Landmark Composting Plan
Ridiculous Study Alert: Eating Organic Food Can Make You A Judgemental Jerk!
This author's twitter feed is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
-
Read Inhabitat
-
Search Categories
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
-
Browse by Keyword
follow inhabitat on:
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
© Inhabitat.com 2012 | About Inhabitat | Contact Us | Advertising with Inhabitat | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Inhabitat, LLC























Why was this study done? AWEA and CanWEA both say that independent studies have proven that there is only 1 bird death/per year per turbine? And there’s lots of bats. They have hardly any impact at all on the environment….. do they not?
We need to get off oil and use wind energy….. do we not?
Wind turbines are clean. They don’t make noise. They don’t kill birds…. or bats. And they increase property value and tourism…… do they not?
And they create green jobs and help the economy…… do they not?
This was very interesting, thank you for the post.
On Wolfe Island in Lake Ontario, a large number of birds, including endangered raptors have been killed by the turbine farm there. http://windconcernsontario.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/wolfe-island-windfarm-turbines-deadly-for-birds-bats/
The number is MUCH larger than predicted by TransAlta Corp., the Alberta-based energy giant that owns the Wolfe Island wind farm, The company insists that the death rates for birds and bats are “within industry norms”.
According to results presented in “Current Biology” and other scientific sources, bats are killed by blood vessels in their lungs that burst due to the air pressure difference created by spinning turbine blades.
Perhaps purple paint will help. What’s clear, however, is that more studies have to be done and accurate facts presented before more turbines are built in important bird areas.
It’s important that research continues to look into how wind power can be seamlessly integrated into natural habitats–that means protecting not only wildlife, but indigenous plants and lands. There’s a great video about the environmental monitoring efforts undertaken by wind farms here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sf4jc4BUamk
(disclaimer: the company that produces these videos is a client of mine)