Pocket of Active Resistance is a modular housing system stuck to the interior walls of la Défense that grows organically out of the insurrection and malcontent of the people. Homes consists of modules affixed to the interior walls of the building that are connected via catwalks and scaffolding. Modules can be connected together to create larger abodes. They look a bit ramshackle and scraped together from recycled parts and pieces, and Malka claims in his proposal that a housing module would only cost 3,000 euros.
La Résistance is a clear theme that runs strongly through French culture, but this design could easily be applied to any building of political or cultural importance. What if these guerrilla modules were affixed to the Pentagon in the US? Malka’s design is strongly based on environmental concerns, as the act of building new always degrades the environment — which is why he proposes these parasitic homes that take advantage of existing infrastructure.
“In light of these social, economic, and ecologic urgencies, it is necessary to reconsider the city with the logic of transformation: through superposition, addition, and the extension of our built heritage more than through that of a univocal tabula rasa. This means reclaiming territory in the marginalized areas of our cities, with projects that bear insurrection and civic mobilization.“
Imagine a world where housing has grown so limited that people revolt and construct their own parasitic homes on any available space they can — like the interior of the famed Arche de la Défense in Paris. Pocket of Active Resistance is a modular complex
[2]
Pocket of Active Resistance is a modular housing system stuck to the interior walls of la Défense that grows organically out of the insurrection and malcontent of the people.
[3]
Homes consists of modules affixed to the interior walls of the building that are connected via catwalks and scaffolding. Modules can be connected together to create larger abodes.
[4]
They look a bit ramshackle and scraped together from recycled parts and pieces, and Malka claims in his proposal that a housing module would only cost 3,000 euros.
[5]
La Résistance is a clear theme that runs strongly through French culture, but this design could easily be applied to any building of political or cultural importance.
[6]
What if these guerrilla modules were affixed to the Pentagon in the US? Or underneath famous bridges, on top of walls, in the courtyard of the Kremlin?
[7]
Malka’s design is strongly based on environmental concerns, as the act of building new always degrades the environment — which is why he proposes these parasitic homes that take advantage of existing infrastructure.
[8]
“In light of these social, economic, and ecologic urgencies, it is necessary to reconsider the city with the logic of transformation: through superposition, addition, and the extension of our built heritage more than through that of a univocal tabula rasa. This means reclaiming territory in the marginalized areas of our cities, with projects that bear insurrection and civic mobilization.”
[9]
“Motivated by the desire to create a new social scenario, the PAR system is a modular complex providing an alternative to the defiant lifestyle, by positioning itself in a permanent state of insurrection. Its growth is articulated by the vitality of its spontaneous community.”
[10]
“A pocket of active resistance created by welcoming the discontented, this act of guerrilla architecture sets out to hijack the “Great arch of fraternity.” Unite the forsaken, the marginalized, refugees, demonstrators, dissenters, hippies, utopians,
[11]
“…It is difficult to speak of “sustainable/environmentally friendly” architecture when the act of building in itself generates environmental degradation. The construction industry results in enormous pollutions of water, air, and land.”
[12]
“In light of these social, economic, and ecologic urgencies, it is necessary to reconsider the city with the logic of transformation: through superposition, addition, and the extension of our built heritage more than through that of a univocal tabula rasa. This means reclaiming territory in the marginalized areas of our cities, with projects that bear insurrection and civic mobilization.”
[13]
“This methodology seeks to promote public participation as an act of resistance against urban restrictions. It is a colonization of neglected public spaces by the participation of a non-specialized labor collective that elaborates on prefabricated and
[14]
“It is fundamental to “para-cité” the city, literally, to lean against it, generating an urban vitality that is reactive and affordable, sustaining its effervescence and thus creating new potentials for collective use.”
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]