Gallery: PHOTOS: Japan’s ACROS Building is a Mountainous Green-Roofed P...

Things have changed since we last wrote about ACROS.

Read the rest of this entry »


or your inhabitat account below


  1. lazyreader June 8, 2011 at 8:29 am

    I’m sure ACROS is nice. What do we do when it’s ubiquitous. People start getting lost in the city. Old cities like Boston or New York, one could navigate using only landmarks, easier to do when buildings are differentiated by color and shapes and materials, be it wood, brick, stone, glass, and metals. Amazing what you can observe using bricks and stones.

  2. lazyreader June 8, 2011 at 8:18 am

    An automobiles skin serves multiple purposes. To provide and aerodynamic sheath, to look good, to protect the interior machinery.

    As for the building, ironically it appears like something out of Indiana Jones, the last remnants left behind by a ancient civilization. Try to interpret it by focusing on the outside, but like a dead language it’s unreadible. It showcases it’s new “Terminator” style featuring the revealed metal endoskeleton infrastructure covered with organic material. Passing this off as “gardens-in-the-sky” to greenwash. As if anybody on the street would benefit from the supposed garden effect. After the Meiji restoration Japan began a rapid process of Westernization which led to the need for new building types such as schools, banks and hotels. The Japanese government also invited foreign architects to both work in Japan and teach new Japanese architects. One of their own architectural attempts was called Giyōfū which led to gems like these.

  3. resolute June 7, 2011 at 10:01 am

    lazyreader, reply to your opinion

    First of all why do you separate green features and the building, it’s architects job to solve all the problems he faces in the given surroundings and combine all of it into a clear, relevant and working solution.
    You say that if one takes all the plants off the building it will look not so visually attractive, maybe so, but plants were part of architect’s response, it’s the same as saying, what if i took car hood off it would not be ‘aesthetically pleasing’.
    If do take the hood off what you’ll see will be not aesthetics but functionality, same for the buildings…

  4. lazyreader June 7, 2011 at 8:22 am

    I’m interested to see what the building would look like without the plants. Probably not very pleasing to the eye. Which shows how the architects focus more on green features than they do about aesthetic. And when all the buildings look alike appearing like Chia pets why bother hiring a architecture firm. Who needs ’em.

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home