<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Obama Announces 54.5 MPG Average Fleet Goal for All US Automakers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles.brodhead3</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/comment-page-1/#comment-349521</link>
		<dc:creator>charles.brodhead3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=282586#comment-349521</guid>
		<description>@caeman -- I appreciate your efforts looking after the economically disadvantaged.  One of the problems with a switch to diesel is that there is only so much available when refining a barrel (42 gallons) of oil.  

&quot;The largest share of the 42 gallons of crude oil ends up as a finished motor gasoline. Motor gasoline accounts for 19.65 gallons (~ 47%) of the finished products produced from a barrel of crude oil. Next is distillate fuel or diesel at 10.03 gallons (~ 24%) . A distant third is jet fuel at only 4.07 gallons per barrel (~ 10%) of crude. Residual oil is typically around 1.72 gallons per barrel (~ 4%).

Other petroleum products that are created from a barrel of oil during the refining process include: still gas, petroleum coke, liquified refinery gas, asphalt and various oils for lubricants, kerosene, waxes and other miscellaneous products. These &quot;other&quot; hydrocarbon products account for the final 15% of the barrel or around 6.53 gallons of the 42 gallon barrel.&quot;

If the US switches to diesel, its price would explode higher while gasoline prices would collapse due to simple supply and demand.  Europe mainly consumes diesel thus balancing the US&#039;s gasoline consumption.  

@Ben -- It&#039;s great to see The Rocky Mountain Institute participate in these forums.  Your continued application of common sense (e.g. focusing on moving people/cargo and not heavy  drivetrains or battery packs) is always welcome and much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@caeman &#8212; I appreciate your efforts looking after the economically disadvantaged.  One of the problems with a switch to diesel is that there is only so much available when refining a barrel (42 gallons) of oil.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The largest share of the 42 gallons of crude oil ends up as a finished motor gasoline. Motor gasoline accounts for 19.65 gallons (~ 47%) of the finished products produced from a barrel of crude oil. Next is distillate fuel or diesel at 10.03 gallons (~ 24%) . A distant third is jet fuel at only 4.07 gallons per barrel (~ 10%) of crude. Residual oil is typically around 1.72 gallons per barrel (~ 4%).</p>
<p>Other petroleum products that are created from a barrel of oil during the refining process include: still gas, petroleum coke, liquified refinery gas, asphalt and various oils for lubricants, kerosene, waxes and other miscellaneous products. These &#8220;other&#8221; hydrocarbon products account for the final 15% of the barrel or around 6.53 gallons of the 42 gallon barrel.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the US switches to diesel, its price would explode higher while gasoline prices would collapse due to simple supply and demand.  Europe mainly consumes diesel thus balancing the US&#8217;s gasoline consumption.  </p>
<p>@Ben &#8212; It&#8217;s great to see The Rocky Mountain Institute participate in these forums.  Your continued application of common sense (e.g. focusing on moving people/cargo and not heavy  drivetrains or battery packs) is always welcome and much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caeman</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/comment-page-1/#comment-348840</link>
		<dc:creator>caeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=282586#comment-348840</guid>
		<description>We could switch all American cars over to diesel.  That would push the average fleet MPG over the new requirement.  It is technology we already have and can implement.  Advanced composites increase the cost of a vehicle too much, such that only the rich can afford the result, but even the low income can afford small diesel cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could switch all American cars over to diesel.  That would push the average fleet MPG over the new requirement.  It is technology we already have and can implement.  Advanced composites increase the cost of a vehicle too much, such that only the rich can afford the result, but even the low income can afford small diesel cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky Mountain Institute</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/comment-page-1/#comment-348837</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky Mountain Institute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=282586#comment-348837</guid>
		<description>Integrative design, vehicle fitness and new manufacturing methods can save far more fuel at a similar sticker price by simplifying automaking and shrinking powertrains. 

Please see Rocky Mountain Institute&#039;s recent blog post on this topic. 

http://blog.rmi.org/TakingFuelEconomyFurther

Thanks,

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Integrative design, vehicle fitness and new manufacturing methods can save far more fuel at a similar sticker price by simplifying automaking and shrinking powertrains. </p>
<p>Please see Rocky Mountain Institute&#8217;s recent blog post on this topic. </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.rmi.org/TakingFuelEconomyFurther" rel="nofollow">http://blog.rmi.org/TakingFuelEconomyFurther</a></p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poland.jr</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/comment-page-1/#comment-347877</link>
		<dc:creator>poland.jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=282586#comment-347877</guid>
		<description>This seems to be a tempest in a teacup. Why should it take until 2025 to achieve 54.5 mpg when many vehicles are almost there already? Why is the bar set so low? With the upcoming improvements in battery and engine technology we should set the goal at 100 mpg and if we fall a little short we still win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be a tempest in a teacup. Why should it take until 2025 to achieve 54.5 mpg when many vehicles are almost there already? Why is the bar set so low? With the upcoming improvements in battery and engine technology we should set the goal at 100 mpg and if we fall a little short we still win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somendra mohan</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/comment-page-1/#comment-347868</link>
		<dc:creator>somendra mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=282586#comment-347868</guid>
		<description>to get better mileage with almost zero pollution on petrol/gas 
and diesel vehicles, please log on
www.smghai.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to get better mileage with almost zero pollution on petrol/gas<br />
and diesel vehicles, please log on<br />
<a href="http://www.smghai.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.smghai.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smghosh</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/comment-page-1/#comment-347867</link>
		<dc:creator>smghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=282586#comment-347867</guid>
		<description>INTERNAL COMBUSTION DEVELOPMENT OF ANY VEHICLE  DRIVEN ON FOSSIL FUEL IS MUST TO GET BETTER FUEL ECONOMY &amp; EMISSION CONTROL. MORE MPG MEANS LESS UN-BURNT/PARTLY BURNT FUEL SMOKE FROM VEHICLE&#039;S EXHAUST SYSTEM ....RESULTING CLEANER ENVIRONMENT.
A foot note from :-
S M GHOSH
Environmentalist &amp; Green technologist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INTERNAL COMBUSTION DEVELOPMENT OF ANY VEHICLE  DRIVEN ON FOSSIL FUEL IS MUST TO GET BETTER FUEL ECONOMY &amp; EMISSION CONTROL. MORE MPG MEANS LESS UN-BURNT/PARTLY BURNT FUEL SMOKE FROM VEHICLE&#8217;S EXHAUST SYSTEM &#8230;.RESULTING CLEANER ENVIRONMENT.<br />
A foot note from :-<br />
S M GHOSH<br />
Environmentalist &amp; Green technologist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msyin</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/comment-page-1/#comment-347792</link>
		<dc:creator>msyin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=282586#comment-347792</guid>
		<description>While it sounds great that car manufactures have finally agreed that the MPG should be 54.5 but I don&#039;t think they need as much time as they are given to get those results since hybrids today ( when driven properly) gets that and better. I have a Prius and with the AC on each time I use it am averaging 54.9 mpg now. Considering how much tax payers support the industry, is this really good news today with gas hovering near $4 a gallon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it sounds great that car manufactures have finally agreed that the MPG should be 54.5 but I don&#8217;t think they need as much time as they are given to get those results since hybrids today ( when driven properly) gets that and better. I have a Prius and with the AC on each time I use it am averaging 54.9 mpg now. Considering how much tax payers support the industry, is this really good news today with gas hovering near $4 a gallon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caeman</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/president-obama-announces-54-5-mpg-average-fleet-goal-for-all-us-automakers/comment-page-1/#comment-347744</link>
		<dc:creator>caeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=282586#comment-347744</guid>
		<description>Will this new legislation price new cars out of reach of the lower and poor class that would benefit from the higher MPG the most?  These are the folks working in factories and usually have to drive long distances to their jobs.  They need the MPG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this new legislation price new cars out of reach of the lower and poor class that would benefit from the higher MPG the most?  These are the folks working in factories and usually have to drive long distances to their jobs.  They need the MPG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
