<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Repealing Light Bulb Efficiency Standards Would Cost Americans $12.5 Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/repealing-light-bulb-efficiency-standards-would-cost-americans-12-5-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/repealing-light-bulb-efficiency-standards-would-cost-americans-12-5-billion/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwee</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/repealing-light-bulb-efficiency-standards-would-cost-americans-12-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-345568</link>
		<dc:creator>redwee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=274997#comment-345568</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll be burning money for light soon enough. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll be burning money for light soon enough. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazyreader</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/repealing-light-bulb-efficiency-standards-would-cost-americans-12-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-345567</link>
		<dc:creator>lazyreader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=274997#comment-345567</guid>
		<description>Your trading one form of environmental conscience for another, maybe the bulbs do save energy but they&#039;re made of toxic mercury. Even if they do save energy, what if we leave the lights on longer and use the same amount of power. Why not get the government out of the energy game and let the consumer worry about energy demand and let the market worry about the supply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your trading one form of environmental conscience for another, maybe the bulbs do save energy but they&#8217;re made of toxic mercury. Even if they do save energy, what if we leave the lights on longer and use the same amount of power. Why not get the government out of the energy game and let the consumer worry about energy demand and let the market worry about the supply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lighthouse10</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/repealing-light-bulb-efficiency-standards-would-cost-americans-12-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-345521</link>
		<dc:creator>lighthouse10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 03:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=274997#comment-345521</guid>
		<description>Bulb Vote Tuesday!

Joe&#039;s Light Bulb Bill delayed, vote  scheduled for tomorrow morning...
Updates on 7 US state repeal bills (Texas legislated on June 17th)
and Canada Government ban delay, on http://ceolas.net/#li01inx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bulb Vote Tuesday!</p>
<p>Joe&#8217;s Light Bulb Bill delayed, vote  scheduled for tomorrow morning&#8230;<br />
Updates on 7 US state repeal bills (Texas legislated on June 17th)<br />
and Canada Government ban delay, on <a href="http://ceolas.net/#li01inx" rel="nofollow">http://ceolas.net/#li01inx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeTinCincy</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/repealing-light-bulb-efficiency-standards-would-cost-americans-12-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-345467</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeTinCincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=274997#comment-345467</guid>
		<description>Just curious about some things.  Where does the 7%/$85 figure come from?  It seems hard to believe that the average U.S. household spends over $1,000 on light bulb costs (including electricity).  Also, why is Rand Paul&#039;s statement so ridiculous?  In one instance, the government fights for freedom of choice and in the other, limiting freedom of choice.  How is that ridiculous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious about some things.  Where does the 7%/$85 figure come from?  It seems hard to believe that the average U.S. household spends over $1,000 on light bulb costs (including electricity).  Also, why is Rand Paul&#8217;s statement so ridiculous?  In one instance, the government fights for freedom of choice and in the other, limiting freedom of choice.  How is that ridiculous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
