New York-based design house SANS wants to be perfectly clear – despite the fact that they use mostly eco-friendly fabrics like organic cotton, soy and wild silk — they do not consider themselves an ‘eco’ fashion line. In fact, in SMAC’s recent video profile on SANS featuring the brand’s new Home Made line of patterns (check it out above), SANS co-founder Lika Volkova asserts that eco-fashion doesn’t exist. “How can fashion possibly be good for the environment?” she muses. “You produce things – you make them.” Lika’s words may be a bit of a slap in the face for fashion brands that wear the badges of their sustainability proudly, but the logic behind her observation is difficult to dispute. Until a line can claim that there is absolutely no production, shipping or packaging associated with its clothing at all, eco-fashion, in the truest sense of the term, might be considered an oxymoron.
Related Posts
-
SANS is a groundbreaking new eco-fashion line based in NYC. Comprised of designer Lika Volkova and sustainable production veteran Alessandro De Vito, SANS pushes
-
During last week’s New York fashion week, avant-garde label SANS combined references as obscure as German comedy with eco-friendly fabrics, pushing the boundaries of sustainable
-
It is not surprising that world renowned french design star Philippe Starck, most famous for his posh hotels and slick furniture recently said “I will
5 Responses to “SANS: Is Eco Fashion an Oxymoron?”
-
Featured Author
Peteris Zilbers’ MoodBroom is a Quirky LED Lamp Disguised as a Broom
BRC Designs’ Spineless Chair is Adorned with the Spines of Old Books
Meet the Tiny House Family Who Built an Amazing Mini Home for Just $12,000
Kohler Makes a Splash at ICFF with a Neon Chartreuse Shipping Container Booth
This author's twitter feed is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
-
Read Inhabitat
-
Search Categories
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
-
Browse by Keyword
follow inhabitat on:
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
© Inhabitat.com 2012 | About Inhabitat | Contact Us | Advertising with Inhabitat | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Inhabitat, LLC

























Who said the point of an eco-fashion line was NO impact?
What’s wrong with calling a reduced-impact line eco-fashion?
Nber, I think that you have a point and it all depends on how we define eco-fashion. Is eco-fashion fashion that does not harm the environment at all? Or is it fashion that is better for the environment than other fashion brands?
It’s like saying that low-fat ice cream is healthfood. It’s certainly healthier than regular ice cream, but calling it healthfood may be stretching it.
I also want to say that in no way is this article saying that eco-fashion does not exist. It is just pointing out a different point of view.
Industry can be no impact if the technology is right. Ants are very industrious, are everywhere yet their agriculture, industry and building complexes are totally sustainable and have been for 50 million years.
Bit mind blowing really
If they can do it, we can.
hmm… this is all very interesting… but there is only three pieces you can download? i really love this collection, but what she\’s talking about in her video and what is available on the site are two different things.
also, there are a lot of communities that make patterns free or cheap to download .. burdastyle is an opensource sewing community.
i still like the collection anyway…
She’s exactly right! “Ecofashion” is 100% bullsh*t. Most of the materials being used are no better than conventional materials, production still takes place half way across the world and everything is overproduced (see how much ends up in discount stores).
Every single company pushing eco are doing it to market crap; pure and simple. So glad that inhabitat has exiled the “ecofashion” to it’s own site.