<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar-Powered Biketower BT 20-112 is a Multi-Story Parking Lot for Bikes!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/solar-powered-biketower-bt-20-112-is-a-multi-story-parking-lot-for-bikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/solar-powered-biketower-bt-20-112-is-a-multi-story-parking-lot-for-bikes/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Anderson</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/solar-powered-biketower-bt-20-112-is-a-multi-story-parking-lot-for-bikes/comment-page-1/#comment-352259</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=295427#comment-352259</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having a hard time envisioning the usefulness of this. I mean, come on -- why do we have to make the bike experience like the car experience? I don&#039;t want a &quot;Bike Parking Garage&quot; and here&#039;s why: If I have to walk 3 or 4 blocks after cycling somewhere, I lose significant amounts of the natural time advantage that cycling provides. The problem of parking for urban cyclists needs a more familiar solution, in two steps (one provided by the environment and one provided by the cyclist):

    1. Copious Secure bike racks near all commercial entrances;
    2. A bike lock of appropriate security for the environment;

It really is simple -- this &quot;green design&quot; fails the Shoemaker / Papanek tests. 

For more on bike parking and security, see:
http://practicalcyclist.blogspot.com/2008/08/byrne-bike-racks-and-design.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time envisioning the usefulness of this. I mean, come on &#8212; why do we have to make the bike experience like the car experience? I don&#8217;t want a &#8220;Bike Parking Garage&#8221; and here&#8217;s why: If I have to walk 3 or 4 blocks after cycling somewhere, I lose significant amounts of the natural time advantage that cycling provides. The problem of parking for urban cyclists needs a more familiar solution, in two steps (one provided by the environment and one provided by the cyclist):</p>
<p>    1. Copious Secure bike racks near all commercial entrances;<br />
    2. A bike lock of appropriate security for the environment;</p>
<p>It really is simple &#8212; this &#8220;green design&#8221; fails the Shoemaker / Papanek tests. </p>
<p>For more on bike parking and security, see:<br />
<a href="http://practicalcyclist.blogspot.com/2008/08/byrne-bike-racks-and-design.html" rel="nofollow">http://practicalcyclist.blogspot.com/2008/08/byrne-bike-racks-and-design.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
