<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanford Unveils Solar Tech That Harnesses Light and Heat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/stanford-harnesses-light-and-heat-with-new-solar-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/stanford-harnesses-light-and-heat-with-new-solar-tech/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:03:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zzrok</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/stanford-harnesses-light-and-heat-with-new-solar-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-376913</link>
		<dc:creator>zzrok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=145005#comment-376913</guid>
		<description>I believe it is talking about electrically.  Because the photo-voltaic process is designed to convert sunlight directly into energy, and in the last paragraph they reference heat-conversion and solar power being equal to the price point of oil.  I just now noticed they also talk about energy (usually meaning electricity) in some parts of the article as well &quot;convert both light and heat into energy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it is talking about electrically.  Because the photo-voltaic process is designed to convert sunlight directly into energy, and in the last paragraph they reference heat-conversion and solar power being equal to the price point of oil.  I just now noticed they also talk about energy (usually meaning electricity) in some parts of the article as well &#8220;convert both light and heat into energy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkreamer</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/stanford-harnesses-light-and-heat-with-new-solar-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-250336</link>
		<dc:creator>bkreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=145005#comment-250336</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s only the electric part of the process we are interested in, economically speaking. What is the efficiency of this part? 
The thermal side is less interesting - we already have solar thermal systems that surpass 80% efficiency. The classic problems are transporting the heat for use elsewhere, or converting it to electricity efficiently, neither of which seem to be addressed by this development (at least as reported).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s only the electric part of the process we are interested in, economically speaking. What is the efficiency of this part?<br />
The thermal side is less interesting &#8211; we already have solar thermal systems that surpass 80% efficiency. The classic problems are transporting the heat for use elsewhere, or converting it to electricity efficiently, neither of which seem to be addressed by this development (at least as reported).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
