<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;State of the Climate&#8221; Report Shows Unprecedented Warming in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/state-of-the-climate-report-shows-unprecedented-warming-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/state-of-the-climate-report-shows-unprecedented-warming-in-australia/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlemaign</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/state-of-the-climate-report-shows-unprecedented-warming-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-370615</link>
		<dc:creator>charlemaign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=94597#comment-370615</guid>
		<description>Do you really think the world is going to reduce emissions?
Back in 1990 when i researched it in depth i concluded as well as 1% of the other scientists that we needed to cut emissions by 90% of 1990 levels worldwide right then.  Now it&#039;s reduce emissions by a lesser amount to only allow what&#039;s acceptable to them as far as damages goes.  One has to wonder what&#039;s acceptable to them.
Apparently some species going extinct, millions starving to death and billions hungry is acceptable to them.
Either cut emissions by 95% now which isn&#039;t going to happen or get into geo-engineering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really think the world is going to reduce emissions?<br />
Back in 1990 when i researched it in depth i concluded as well as 1% of the other scientists that we needed to cut emissions by 90% of 1990 levels worldwide right then.  Now it&#8217;s reduce emissions by a lesser amount to only allow what&#8217;s acceptable to them as far as damages goes.  One has to wonder what&#8217;s acceptable to them.<br />
Apparently some species going extinct, millions starving to death and billions hungry is acceptable to them.<br />
Either cut emissions by 95% now which isn&#8217;t going to happen or get into geo-engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
