<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;THIS TABLE WILL SELF-DESTRUCT&#8217; by STUDIO 1a.m.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everette</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/comment-page-1/#comment-44208</link>
		<dc:creator>Everette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/23/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/#comment-44208</guid>
		<description>cute idea, nice execution, but has it really been thought out?

as you lose the pixels, each table becomes less valuable, not more. you would only make it to table# x and then there is either not enough material to call it a table, or none to buy at all.

a run of 1000 tables with a unique configuration will eventually sell 1000 tables. By this loss of pixels idea, only say, 800 willl be bought, the last 200 either too chiseled, or not &quot;exclusive&quot; enough and become less and less wanted or coveted, which is a waste. (see: limited edition cars, sports memorbillia, etc.) 

the irony is that this by it&#039;s own logic, this is a very consumer demand project, not a responsible one. one-of is unique and worth the price, one of even a few losses it value on some scale.

intresting and thought provoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cute idea, nice execution, but has it really been thought out?</p>
<p>as you lose the pixels, each table becomes less valuable, not more. you would only make it to table# x and then there is either not enough material to call it a table, or none to buy at all.</p>
<p>a run of 1000 tables with a unique configuration will eventually sell 1000 tables. By this loss of pixels idea, only say, 800 willl be bought, the last 200 either too chiseled, or not &#8220;exclusive&#8221; enough and become less and less wanted or coveted, which is a waste. (see: limited edition cars, sports memorbillia, etc.) </p>
<p>the irony is that this by it&#8217;s own logic, this is a very consumer demand project, not a responsible one. one-of is unique and worth the price, one of even a few losses it value on some scale.</p>
<p>intresting and thought provoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/comment-page-1/#comment-44019</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/23/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/#comment-44019</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s mass produced in this design... the sorghum wood base ? How do you &#039;mass produce&#039; a &#039;one off&#039; item ? Is this a &#039;test&#039;... an April Fools day joke that&#039;s just later in the month ? 

If they used &#039;PaperCrete&#039;... THEN, they&#039;d be onto something. At least then, if the tables tilted over... toes might survive the exprience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s mass produced in this design&#8230; the sorghum wood base ? How do you &#8216;mass produce&#8217; a &#8216;one off&#8217; item ? Is this a &#8216;test&#8217;&#8230; an April Fools day joke that&#8217;s just later in the month ? </p>
<p>If they used &#8216;PaperCrete&#8217;&#8230; THEN, they&#8217;d be onto something. At least then, if the tables tilted over&#8230; toes might survive the exprience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Simpson</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/comment-page-1/#comment-44015</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/23/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/#comment-44015</guid>
		<description>Although it&#039;s made of concrete and is really very expensive for what it is, I think it&#039;s a very clever idea and would love one of these. I was going to say this could be made of wood, but the unique grain within any piece of wood would lose the homogenous nature of the tables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it&#8217;s made of concrete and is really very expensive for what it is, I think it&#8217;s a very clever idea and would love one of these. I was going to say this could be made of wood, but the unique grain within any piece of wood would lose the homogenous nature of the tables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in Bali</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/comment-page-1/#comment-43995</link>
		<dc:creator>David in Bali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/23/studio-1am-this-table-will-self-destruct/#comment-43995</guid>
		<description>The Craft of Gimmick?

I guess I miss the heavy social commentary your find in this series of tables, as well as any design merit. And far more than telling a story of mass production, it tells a story of creating a limited production collectable through a unique approach. Clearly this table will not self destruct so the effort at clever pun (is Mission Impossible still cool?) escapes me. I&#039;m curious if the studio will increase the sale price as production costs increase with the added complexity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Craft of Gimmick?</p>
<p>I guess I miss the heavy social commentary your find in this series of tables, as well as any design merit. And far more than telling a story of mass production, it tells a story of creating a limited production collectable through a unique approach. Clearly this table will not self destruct so the effort at clever pun (is Mission Impossible still cool?) escapes me. I&#8217;m curious if the studio will increase the sale price as production costs increase with the added complexity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
