- Inhabitat – Green Design, Innovation, Architecture, Green Building - http://inhabitat.com -

Study Shows that Nuclear Power Plants in Europe are Not Ready for Disaster

Posted By Kristine Lofgren On October 11, 2012 @ 2:40 pm In Design,Disaster-proof design,Environment,News,Policy,Renewable Energy | 1 Comment

Nuclear safety, Nuclear power plants, Europe Power Plants, European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group, Nuclear power, Fukushima safety, Fukushima disaster, natural disasters [1]

The Fukushima disaster [2] following the tsunami that hit Japan in 2011 was an eye-opening event that caused many to wonder just how safe nuclear power [3] is. Thanks to a new study commissioned as a result of the disaster, we have an answer – and it doesn’t look good. The results of the study [4] show that of 145 reactors examined in Europe, the vast majority of them fail in one or more safety preparedness aspects.

Nuclear safety, Nuclear power plants, Europe Power Plants, European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group, Nuclear power, Fukushima safety, Fukushima disaster, natural disasters [5]

According to the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group [6], of the 145 reactors studied, 121 lacked adequate instruments to detect earthquake activity [7] and 81 lacked equipment to deal with severe accidents like earthquakes or floods. Additionally, 24 reactors were missing emergency backup control rooms and 32 lacked venting to prevent pressure from building up if the primary cooling fails in the event of a disaster.

The good news is that the group reported that none of the reactors needed to be shut down because of these problems, but each country was asked to resolve the issues pointed out by the report by the end of 2014. Changes include adding backup power supplies, taking steps to improve seismic safety [8], and adding additional venting.

The study involved a peer-reviewed process that tested for both natural and man-made events, including terrorist attacks, human failure and natural disasters. Specifically, reviewers were looking to uncover weakness in reactor safety beyond the originally designed safety measures. Once the group’s recommendations are implemented, the repeat of a disaster like Fukushima [9] will be (hopefully) much less likely.

+ European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group [6]

Via New Scientist [10]

images from Petr Kratochvil [11] and Row17 [12]

Article printed from Inhabitat – Green Design, Innovation, Architecture, Green Building: http://inhabitat.com

URL to article: http://inhabitat.com/study-shows-that-nuclear-power-plants-in-europe-are-not-ready-for-disaster/

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://inhabitat.com/?attachment_id=447885

[2] The Fukushima disaster: http://inhabitat.com/fish-near-fukushima-found-to-have-the-highest-level-of-radioactive-caesium-detected-in-wildlife/

[3] nuclear power: http://inhabitat.com/tag/nuclear-power/

[4] The results of the study: http://www.ensreg.eu/sites/default/files/20121004%20Staff%20Working%20Document-Final.pdf

[5] Image: http://inhabitat.com/?attachment_id=447884

[6] European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group: http://www.ensreg.eu/

[7] earthquake activity: http://inhabitat.com/earthquake-proof-wood-luck-bed-protects-you-from-falling-buildings-while-you-sleep/

[8] improve seismic safety: http://inhabitat.com/shake-table-used-to-simulate-earthquake-on-fake-hospital/

[9] disaster like Fukushima: http://inhabitat.com/japanese-mayor-to-restart-two-nuclear-reactors-to-save-local-economy/

[10] New Scientist: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22355-european-nuclear-power-plants-illset-for-disaster.html?cmpid=RSS%7CNSNS%7C2012-GLOBAL%7Cenvironment

[11] Petr Kratochvil: http://inhabitat.comPetr Kratochvil

[12] Row17: http://www.geograph.org.uk/profile/17899

Copyright © 2011 Inhabitat Local - New York. All rights reserved.