<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stunning Lookout Frames the Jalisco Mountains for Weary Pilgrims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/stunning-lookout-frames-the-jalisco-mountains-for-weary-pilgrims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/stunning-lookout-frames-the-jalisco-mountains-for-weary-pilgrims/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tafline Laylin</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/stunning-lookout-frames-the-jalisco-mountains-for-weary-pilgrims/comment-page-1/#comment-344116</link>
		<dc:creator>Tafline Laylin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=269199#comment-344116</guid>
		<description>Terry, thanks for your comment. Given the location of this site (high in the mountains and subject to rough weather), I&#039;m not sure a simple timber platform would be more sustainable (it would probably need regular replacing). Concrete is most wasteful when a lot of it is used and wasted. That didn&#039;t happen here, and the shelter will keep pilgrims warm for years to come. (Granted, it won&#039;t be biodegradable). As much as I agree that the word &quot;sustainable&quot; is bandied about too freely, I also think that it&#039;s important to consider each project in its unique context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, thanks for your comment. Given the location of this site (high in the mountains and subject to rough weather), I&#8217;m not sure a simple timber platform would be more sustainable (it would probably need regular replacing). Concrete is most wasteful when a lot of it is used and wasted. That didn&#8217;t happen here, and the shelter will keep pilgrims warm for years to come. (Granted, it won&#8217;t be biodegradable). As much as I agree that the word &#8220;sustainable&#8221; is bandied about too freely, I also think that it&#8217;s important to consider each project in its unique context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turnstiles</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/stunning-lookout-frames-the-jalisco-mountains-for-weary-pilgrims/comment-page-1/#comment-343780</link>
		<dc:creator>turnstiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/?p=269199#comment-343780</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry - but considering the environmental impact of concrete (one of the least &#039;green&#039; building materials)I consider this a highly inappropriate platform for a place of natural wilderness. For a panoramic platform and shaded rest stop this is surely overkill? A simple timber, covered platform would create a far less intrusive footprint. The term &#039;sustainable&#039; is far too easily thrown about these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry &#8211; but considering the environmental impact of concrete (one of the least &#8216;green&#8217; building materials)I consider this a highly inappropriate platform for a place of natural wilderness. For a panoramic platform and shaded rest stop this is surely overkill? A simple timber, covered platform would create a far less intrusive footprint. The term &#8216;sustainable&#8217; is far too easily thrown about these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
