<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SWIFFER SUSTAINABILITY: The swiffer designer speaks up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: harmony</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-297764</link>
		<dc:creator>harmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-297764</guid>
		<description>Swiffer was not designed by Design Continuum. The original Swiffer dry mop and Wet Jet were designed by Joss Design in Chicago. I was a team leader at Joss through the entire design, engineering, and production planning and at no point did we get input from Design Continuum. No doubt Continuum worked on the brand at some point, but Zaccai&#039;s ongoing claim that he &quot;designed the Swiffer&quot; is a PR fabrication to claim credit for a successful product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swiffer was not designed by Design Continuum. The original Swiffer dry mop and Wet Jet were designed by Joss Design in Chicago. I was a team leader at Joss through the entire design, engineering, and production planning and at no point did we get input from Design Continuum. No doubt Continuum worked on the brand at some point, but Zaccai&#8217;s ongoing claim that he &#8220;designed the Swiffer&#8221; is a PR fabrication to claim credit for a successful product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msad2000</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-270087</link>
		<dc:creator>msad2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-270087</guid>
		<description>I put elastic in couple large washcloths.  I make my own cleaner - water and couple tablespoons liquid fabric softener in spritzer bottle and voila washable, reusable pads. No more disposable pads into the landfill and much less expensive cleaning liquid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put elastic in couple large washcloths.  I make my own cleaner &#8211; water and couple tablespoons liquid fabric softener in spritzer bottle and voila washable, reusable pads. No more disposable pads into the landfill and much less expensive cleaning liquid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turb0</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-183261</link>
		<dc:creator>turb0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-183261</guid>
		<description>You are buying garbage!! C&#039;mon people!  If you buy this highly proprietary product you have to use their &quot;pads&quot; to make the unit operate.

I feel that anything you buy and have to throw out because it is rendered useless is G A R B A G E!

I hate this product.  I purchased one (sucked in by the blasting of the ads), and after the first use tossed the whole thing out.

Buckets? Hot water? Chemicals?  Gee Bob, I use the sink as my pail (note that it is not rendered useless after 1 cleaning).  Hot water, you bet!  Oh but gosh, my electricity comes via hydro electric so no emissions there and once again, not rendered useless after 1 cleaning.  Chemicals? Ok ya got me there, but Mr Clean lasts waaaaaaaaay longer then that crap in the bottles, oh and &quot;Mr Green&quot; no one ever mentioned those keen batteries needed to power the stupid thing.

Nope, you lose, your product is by nature designed to keep you guys fat on making the consumer buy garbage!

I&#039;ll stick with my mpe and 2 hands, once again! not rendered useless after 1 use.  

Companies like you and my most favorite Johnson &amp; Johnson &quot;A family company&quot; (poising the earth for 40 years should be forced to shutdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are buying garbage!! C&#8217;mon people!  If you buy this highly proprietary product you have to use their &#8220;pads&#8221; to make the unit operate.</p>
<p>I feel that anything you buy and have to throw out because it is rendered useless is G A R B A G E!</p>
<p>I hate this product.  I purchased one (sucked in by the blasting of the ads), and after the first use tossed the whole thing out.</p>
<p>Buckets? Hot water? Chemicals?  Gee Bob, I use the sink as my pail (note that it is not rendered useless after 1 cleaning).  Hot water, you bet!  Oh but gosh, my electricity comes via hydro electric so no emissions there and once again, not rendered useless after 1 cleaning.  Chemicals? Ok ya got me there, but Mr Clean lasts waaaaaaaaay longer then that crap in the bottles, oh and &#8220;Mr Green&#8221; no one ever mentioned those keen batteries needed to power the stupid thing.</p>
<p>Nope, you lose, your product is by nature designed to keep you guys fat on making the consumer buy garbage!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll stick with my mpe and 2 hands, once again! not rendered useless after 1 use.  </p>
<p>Companies like you and my most favorite Johnson &amp; Johnson &#8220;A family company&#8221; (poising the earth for 40 years should be forced to shutdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekhumphrey</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-79478</link>
		<dc:creator>ekhumphrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-79478</guid>
		<description>How much energy, water, waste goes into making these things? The units, the pads, the cleaning solution? Not only are the pads landfilled, but so are the batteries the WetJet, the empty plastic containers for the cleaning solution and eventually the units themselves.

All of these factors have to be taken into account when declaring something &quot;green.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much energy, water, waste goes into making these things? The units, the pads, the cleaning solution? Not only are the pads landfilled, but so are the batteries the WetJet, the empty plastic containers for the cleaning solution and eventually the units themselves.</p>
<p>All of these factors have to be taken into account when declaring something &#8220;green.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.H.Waite</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-56521</link>
		<dc:creator>G.H.Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-56521</guid>
		<description>I am a cheapskate. When I used up the bottle full of whatever that stuff is, I filled it with plain water. I also use a rag on the thing. I have never, ever used hot water to mop. I have to wonder what kind of greasy dives some folks live in. Most of the time I just sweep and that takes away 90% of the dirt. I am annoyed at the design of the bottles for one use only and I am also annoyed that I have to get batteries for a frickin mop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a cheapskate. When I used up the bottle full of whatever that stuff is, I filled it with plain water. I also use a rag on the thing. I have never, ever used hot water to mop. I have to wonder what kind of greasy dives some folks live in. Most of the time I just sweep and that takes away 90% of the dirt. I am annoyed at the design of the bottles for one use only and I am also annoyed that I have to get batteries for a frickin mop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52937</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-52937</guid>
		<description>sept / oct axis magazine has an article about how it goes around buying up ideas, 

the swiffer was the biggest one -

which means that all the research conducted by contiuum was back searched - 

validating a product for the u.s market - and in this article back searching to make it green.

the danger of this is, if you want to believe its green, your research is going to come out that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sept / oct axis magazine has an article about how it goes around buying up ideas, </p>
<p>the swiffer was the biggest one -</p>
<p>which means that all the research conducted by contiuum was back searched &#8211; </p>
<p>validating a product for the u.s market &#8211; and in this article back searching to make it green.</p>
<p>the danger of this is, if you want to believe its green, your research is going to come out that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-51182</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-51182</guid>
		<description>In reply to Robbi&#039;s comment &quot;The chemical in the wet-jet is harmful to pets [...]&quot;: that&#039;s a hoax/rumor/urban legend.

It&#039;s described and debunked at snopes.com:

http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/swiffer.asp

I&#039;d be skeptical if the company alone made the claim that the product is safe for pets, but the WetJet solution has also been investigated by the ASPCA:

http://www.aspca.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&amp;id=16054&amp;security=2220&amp;news_iv_ctrl=1400

The pages above also describe the ingredients of the cleaning solution.

Full disclosure: I bought one of these today, and used it in my bathroom. I&#039;m now using lots of extra energy running the ventilating fan, because the cleaning solution has a strong and long-lasting scent. Can something be done to convince the general population (or the marketers) that a &quot;clean smell&quot; doesn&#039;t involve putting a time-release fragrance bomb in my house?

I happened upon this discussion while checking to see if the solution can be replaced with vinegar and water, or ammonia and water. It turns out that it can, if you have a strong enough wrench and are careful in removing and replacing the &quot;permanently attached&quot; bottle cap. I&#039;ll also investigate reusable cleaning pads when the supply gives out. As noted by other commenters, it&#039;s sometimes possible to use a non-green product in a green way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Robbi&#8217;s comment &#8220;The chemical in the wet-jet is harmful to pets [...]&#8220;: that&#8217;s a hoax/rumor/urban legend.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s described and debunked at snopes.com:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/swiffer.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/swiffer.asp</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d be skeptical if the company alone made the claim that the product is safe for pets, but the WetJet solution has also been investigated by the ASPCA:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aspca.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&#038;id=16054&#038;security=2220&#038;news_iv_ctrl=1400" rel="nofollow">http://www.aspca.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&#038;id=16054&#038;security=2220&#038;news_iv_ctrl=1400</a></p>
<p>The pages above also describe the ingredients of the cleaning solution.</p>
<p>Full disclosure: I bought one of these today, and used it in my bathroom. I&#8217;m now using lots of extra energy running the ventilating fan, because the cleaning solution has a strong and long-lasting scent. Can something be done to convince the general population (or the marketers) that a &#8220;clean smell&#8221; doesn&#8217;t involve putting a time-release fragrance bomb in my house?</p>
<p>I happened upon this discussion while checking to see if the solution can be replaced with vinegar and water, or ammonia and water. It turns out that it can, if you have a strong enough wrench and are careful in removing and replacing the &#8220;permanently attached&#8221; bottle cap. I&#8217;ll also investigate reusable cleaning pads when the supply gives out. As noted by other commenters, it&#8217;s sometimes possible to use a non-green product in a green way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G. Martino</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-48870</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G. Martino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-48870</guid>
		<description>Another response to the general &quot;if it&#039;s one-use only, it&#039;s not green&quot; sentiment:

One-use doesn&#039;t mean &quot;not green&quot; if the thing being disposed of is an improvement over the other items which are one-time use.  

Several commenters have said that a mop with soap and water is &quot;greener&quot; than a Swiffer pad.  Perhaps it is.  But remember that the soap/detergent and the water you use to mop with are &quot;one-use&quot; only resources in a case like this.

Now of course, I don&#039;t know all the details about exactly what resources are consumed by the manufacture of a single Swiffer pad vs. the resources consumed in the manufacture of soap/detergent, or the resources involved in providing your water.  If you live near a lake or the ocean, clearly it would be far &quot;greener&quot; to fill your mop bucket from those water sources, because there&#039;s no reason at all to use potable water to mop your floor.

But in some of the most populous areas of the world, there isn&#039;t enough water, PERIOD.  Using water to mop floors in those parts of the world is likely to be more wasteful (in terms of localized resource costs) than using a piece of chemical-impregnated paper.

Ultimately, the point is: don&#039;t become kneejerk in your quest for &quot;greener&quot; solutions.  If you don&#039;t like the product, of course you shouldn&#039;t use it, but to attempt fact-based argument against something you don&#039;t know much about is just lazy rationalization.

As an absurd but simple example--it&#039;s more harmful to the environment to use one single styrofoam cup for your coffee for 30 days than to use 30 paper cups and throw them away each time.  (NOTE: This example is acknowledged as absurd.  Obviously, porcelain is a better alternative than either paper or styrofoam.)

Do any of the water-mop advocates fill their buckets in the local stream or pond?  If not, why not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another response to the general &#8220;if it&#8217;s one-use only, it&#8217;s not green&#8221; sentiment:</p>
<p>One-use doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;not green&#8221; if the thing being disposed of is an improvement over the other items which are one-time use.  </p>
<p>Several commenters have said that a mop with soap and water is &#8220;greener&#8221; than a Swiffer pad.  Perhaps it is.  But remember that the soap/detergent and the water you use to mop with are &#8220;one-use&#8221; only resources in a case like this.</p>
<p>Now of course, I don&#8217;t know all the details about exactly what resources are consumed by the manufacture of a single Swiffer pad vs. the resources consumed in the manufacture of soap/detergent, or the resources involved in providing your water.  If you live near a lake or the ocean, clearly it would be far &#8220;greener&#8221; to fill your mop bucket from those water sources, because there&#8217;s no reason at all to use potable water to mop your floor.</p>
<p>But in some of the most populous areas of the world, there isn&#8217;t enough water, PERIOD.  Using water to mop floors in those parts of the world is likely to be more wasteful (in terms of localized resource costs) than using a piece of chemical-impregnated paper.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the point is: don&#8217;t become kneejerk in your quest for &#8220;greener&#8221; solutions.  If you don&#8217;t like the product, of course you shouldn&#8217;t use it, but to attempt fact-based argument against something you don&#8217;t know much about is just lazy rationalization.</p>
<p>As an absurd but simple example&#8211;it&#8217;s more harmful to the environment to use one single styrofoam cup for your coffee for 30 days than to use 30 paper cups and throw them away each time.  (NOTE: This example is acknowledged as absurd.  Obviously, porcelain is a better alternative than either paper or styrofoam.)</p>
<p>Do any of the water-mop advocates fill their buckets in the local stream or pond?  If not, why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-48838</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-48838</guid>
		<description>I am 26 and when I went to college - INSTEAD of buying a regular mop, I bought a swiffer wet jet.  I use the pads only for heavy duty cleaning jobs.  Instead, I usually use a washcloth that I pin to the swiffer&#039;s head and wash that with my laundry.  Just dampen the washcloth and, when I need an extra kick, I use the swiffer liquid.
It takes me so long to go through 1 box of swiffer pads and 1 bottel of solution this way - safe the earth and my pocketbook.  Also, in the 7 years I have had this, I have only had to replace the battery used to opperate the swiffer 1 time - and since I use rechargable batteries I don&#039;t really think much of that either!
Think of the energy I have saved from not vacuming as frequently!
I never had to throw away a mop and never had to fill a hot water bucket up with tons of unnecessary chemicals and throw that down the drain.
The Swiffer is Green if you use it right - anything can be used wastefully so just be smart about how you use products and be smart about how you treat the earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am 26 and when I went to college &#8211; INSTEAD of buying a regular mop, I bought a swiffer wet jet.  I use the pads only for heavy duty cleaning jobs.  Instead, I usually use a washcloth that I pin to the swiffer&#8217;s head and wash that with my laundry.  Just dampen the washcloth and, when I need an extra kick, I use the swiffer liquid.<br />
It takes me so long to go through 1 box of swiffer pads and 1 bottel of solution this way &#8211; safe the earth and my pocketbook.  Also, in the 7 years I have had this, I have only had to replace the battery used to opperate the swiffer 1 time &#8211; and since I use rechargable batteries I don&#8217;t really think much of that either!<br />
Think of the energy I have saved from not vacuming as frequently!<br />
I never had to throw away a mop and never had to fill a hot water bucket up with tons of unnecessary chemicals and throw that down the drain.<br />
The Swiffer is Green if you use it right &#8211; anything can be used wastefully so just be smart about how you use products and be smart about how you treat the earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-48804</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-48804</guid>
		<description>1. There is a swiffer with a washable head - RealSimple magazine&#039;s cleaning products line offers a great one with a nubby cottony/synthetic head that washes perfectly.

2. There is a consumer products green certification in existence - Cradle to Cradle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. There is a swiffer with a washable head &#8211; RealSimple magazine&#8217;s cleaning products line offers a great one with a nubby cottony/synthetic head that washes perfectly.</p>
<p>2. There is a consumer products green certification in existence &#8211; Cradle to Cradle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbi</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-48797</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-48797</guid>
		<description>The chemical in the wet-jet is harmful to pets.  Vinegar water is not.  I have the swiffer mop, because it&#039;s light weight, but all you need is any old piece of soft cloth. I happen to like my son &amp; hubby&#039;s  threadbare &quot;tighty whities&quot; LOL  If I were going to start over with new cloths, I&#039;d buy a pack or two of cloth diapers. The longer they&#039;re used, the softer and better they work. My mom always had a rag bag, so do I.  Yes, we had a dust mop. The head was removable and washable. We&#039;d hang it on the clothesline and it was &quot;bleached&quot; by the sun! We got it from the Fuller Brush man.  They still have products.  www.fullerbrush.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chemical in the wet-jet is harmful to pets.  Vinegar water is not.  I have the swiffer mop, because it&#8217;s light weight, but all you need is any old piece of soft cloth. I happen to like my son &amp; hubby&#8217;s  threadbare &#8220;tighty whities&#8221; LOL  If I were going to start over with new cloths, I&#8217;d buy a pack or two of cloth diapers. The longer they&#8217;re used, the softer and better they work. My mom always had a rag bag, so do I.  Yes, we had a dust mop. The head was removable and washable. We&#8217;d hang it on the clothesline and it was &#8220;bleached&#8221; by the sun! We got it from the Fuller Brush man.  They still have products.  <a href="http://www.fullerbrush.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fullerbrush.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-48796</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-48796</guid>
		<description>Use a microfiber mop (can be laundered 500 times) and it is very effective with just water .  As for cleaning products, there is nothing better than Our House products.  Check out this website:

www.ourhouseworks.com

The products can be ordered online and sent directly to your home.  They are manufactured in an environmentally conscious plant.  They don&#039;t even have floor drains as all waste is recycled.

Input the 4 digit code of &quot;1408&quot; to receive a discount.

I have been using these for about two years and find them very safe &amp; green, yet effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use a microfiber mop (can be laundered 500 times) and it is very effective with just water .  As for cleaning products, there is nothing better than Our House products.  Check out this website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ourhouseworks.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ourhouseworks.com</a></p>
<p>The products can be ordered online and sent directly to your home.  They are manufactured in an environmentally conscious plant.  They don&#8217;t even have floor drains as all waste is recycled.</p>
<p>Input the 4 digit code of &#8220;1408&#8243; to receive a discount.</p>
<p>I have been using these for about two years and find them very safe &amp; green, yet effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Ziobro</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-48794</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Ziobro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-48794</guid>
		<description>I bought a yard of polarfleece (made from recycled soda bottles!) :-) and cut it into Swiffer-size pieces. I use them to do the floors, and when I wash them, I use minimal detergent. The &quot;trick&quot; is to dry them in the dryer without any fabric softeners. They dry super-fast (less than 10 minutes) and they are full of static to grab the dirt. These reusable cloths work better than the throw-away paper ones, IMO.

For the Wet Jet, which I really love on our hardwood and slate floors, I use old infant-size cloth prefold diapers. Same deal... wash and reuse, no fabric softener. They are really absorbent and they are easy to attach to the mop head with a pair of binder clips (at either end). My cloth diapers have been used on five babies so far and I use the ugliest stained ones on the floor... this is about the best recycling of cloth that would otherwise be thrown away that I can think of! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a yard of polarfleece (made from recycled soda bottles!) <img src='http://inhabitat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  and cut it into Swiffer-size pieces. I use them to do the floors, and when I wash them, I use minimal detergent. The &#8220;trick&#8221; is to dry them in the dryer without any fabric softeners. They dry super-fast (less than 10 minutes) and they are full of static to grab the dirt. These reusable cloths work better than the throw-away paper ones, IMO.</p>
<p>For the Wet Jet, which I really love on our hardwood and slate floors, I use old infant-size cloth prefold diapers. Same deal&#8230; wash and reuse, no fabric softener. They are really absorbent and they are easy to attach to the mop head with a pair of binder clips (at either end). My cloth diapers have been used on five babies so far and I use the ugliest stained ones on the floor&#8230; this is about the best recycling of cloth that would otherwise be thrown away that I can think of! <img src='http://inhabitat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Pings</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-47337</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Pings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-47337</guid>
		<description>No mention that the original Swiffer idea was lifting a product that already existed in Japan?  P&amp;G bought the original product from a Japanese company named Lion, who had copied a product already in the Japan market from Japan&#039;s Kao Corporation, Qwickle Mop.  P&amp;G has since evolved and improved upon ideas with deep additional consumer insights for USA households.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention that the original Swiffer idea was lifting a product that already existed in Japan?  P&amp;G bought the original product from a Japanese company named Lion, who had copied a product already in the Japan market from Japan&#8217;s Kao Corporation, Qwickle Mop.  P&amp;G has since evolved and improved upon ideas with deep additional consumer insights for USA households.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moom</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-47323</link>
		<dc:creator>Moom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-47323</guid>
		<description>I think J&#039;s comment is an important insight. The Swiffer is not designed to last - anybody care to guess how many Swiffer lifetimes a standard mop lasts? It&#039;s lightness of construction is a dead giveaway. What&#039;s more, I&#039;m reading &#039;cradle to cradle&#039; at the moment, and Mr Zaccai&#039;s approach personifies one of the authors&#039; bugbears - as they put it, &#039;less bad is no good&#039;. This design is all about &#039;less bad&#039; - green sensibilities have been tagged onto the end of the specification as a secondary (or possibly tertiary) consideration - the primary requirement being &#039;create a disposable cleaning system&#039;.

Clearly personal circumstances will override our environmental sensibilities sometimes - I&#039;m sure it&#039;s great for people with back problems, and I can understand how the disposability is an asset in medical/veterinary circumstances. I wouldn&#039;t condemn anyone for using this product - consumers have to weight up green issues just as much as producers. If you don&#039;t like it, don&#039;t buy it. I certainly won&#039;t.

(I&#039;m really not sure I buy Mr Zaccai&#039;s assertion that people spend more time cleaning the mop than they do the floor, either, but if they claim to have researched it, who am I to argue?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think J&#8217;s comment is an important insight. The Swiffer is not designed to last &#8211; anybody care to guess how many Swiffer lifetimes a standard mop lasts? It&#8217;s lightness of construction is a dead giveaway. What&#8217;s more, I&#8217;m reading &#8216;cradle to cradle&#8217; at the moment, and Mr Zaccai&#8217;s approach personifies one of the authors&#8217; bugbears &#8211; as they put it, &#8216;less bad is no good&#8217;. This design is all about &#8216;less bad&#8217; &#8211; green sensibilities have been tagged onto the end of the specification as a secondary (or possibly tertiary) consideration &#8211; the primary requirement being &#8216;create a disposable cleaning system&#8217;.</p>
<p>Clearly personal circumstances will override our environmental sensibilities sometimes &#8211; I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s great for people with back problems, and I can understand how the disposability is an asset in medical/veterinary circumstances. I wouldn&#8217;t condemn anyone for using this product &#8211; consumers have to weight up green issues just as much as producers. If you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t buy it. I certainly won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m really not sure I buy Mr Zaccai&#8217;s assertion that people spend more time cleaning the mop than they do the floor, either, but if they claim to have researched it, who am I to argue?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelly</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-47292</link>
		<dc:creator>kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-47292</guid>
		<description>I work at a vet hospital and we use swiffer. I get tons of inquries into whether it works, I alwyas talk to them for 5 minutes about how swiffer is not enviromentally friendly and suggest method&#039;s version. I probably get asked this 3 times a day. I&#039;m trying to get the hospital to use method- but our laundry is already a huge problem....reading this, I dont buy it. I use a broom still. It&#039;s just as good as the swiffer I use at work for most households(the hospital&#039;s level of pet hair is diffrent, we get 300 animals in a day). 
As for the saves water and electricity from washing a cloth- how much extra energy/water am I using it tossing it in a full load?? And how long will the thousands of swiffer pads take to decompose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work at a vet hospital and we use swiffer. I get tons of inquries into whether it works, I alwyas talk to them for 5 minutes about how swiffer is not enviromentally friendly and suggest method&#8217;s version. I probably get asked this 3 times a day. I&#8217;m trying to get the hospital to use method- but our laundry is already a huge problem&#8230;.reading this, I dont buy it. I use a broom still. It&#8217;s just as good as the swiffer I use at work for most households(the hospital&#8217;s level of pet hair is diffrent, we get 300 animals in a day).<br />
As for the saves water and electricity from washing a cloth- how much extra energy/water am I using it tossing it in a full load?? And how long will the thousands of swiffer pads take to decompose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariro10</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-47290</link>
		<dc:creator>mariro10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-47290</guid>
		<description>I think the inventor of Swiffer products has made a very worthwhile contribution to the world.  There are a great many people with osteoarthritis and other slightly debilitating diseases; and he has put cleaning tools out they can actually use, making them more independent.

Moreover, if you consider electricity for heating water, and washing and drying cloths, Swiffer is a hands down winner!  Yeah!!  And  a design award for Mr. Zaiccai.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the inventor of Swiffer products has made a very worthwhile contribution to the world.  There are a great many people with osteoarthritis and other slightly debilitating diseases; and he has put cleaning tools out they can actually use, making them more independent.</p>
<p>Moreover, if you consider electricity for heating water, and washing and drying cloths, Swiffer is a hands down winner!  Yeah!!  And  a design award for Mr. Zaiccai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-47285</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-47285</guid>
		<description>I recently went back to a good old fashioned mop, a sponge mop at that. Been using one for years and so had my Mom. The sponge pads are reuseable, are rinsed/cleaned efter each use and while they get thrown away, they are not often done so until after several uses, sometimes months later.

I had used the wet swifter pads on my original swifter, which I bought to get rid of dust bunnies and such when I had hardwood floors and I was not too impressed with their cleaning power, and often didn&#039;t get all of the dirt up so yes, I had to wipe up after I mopped. 

Bleach/water, ammonia/water or heck, vinager/water solutions all work great and do not require any rinsing afterwords. I find bleach is really good for very dirty floors that a standard cleaning just doesn&#039;t get.

And when all said and done, it doesn&#039;t really take all that much time or effort and the scratchy pad that most sponge mops have help in those stubborn spots too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently went back to a good old fashioned mop, a sponge mop at that. Been using one for years and so had my Mom. The sponge pads are reuseable, are rinsed/cleaned efter each use and while they get thrown away, they are not often done so until after several uses, sometimes months later.</p>
<p>I had used the wet swifter pads on my original swifter, which I bought to get rid of dust bunnies and such when I had hardwood floors and I was not too impressed with their cleaning power, and often didn&#8217;t get all of the dirt up so yes, I had to wipe up after I mopped. </p>
<p>Bleach/water, ammonia/water or heck, vinager/water solutions all work great and do not require any rinsing afterwords. I find bleach is really good for very dirty floors that a standard cleaning just doesn&#8217;t get.</p>
<p>And when all said and done, it doesn&#8217;t really take all that much time or effort and the scratchy pad that most sponge mops have help in those stubborn spots too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-47249</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-47249</guid>
		<description>I USE A WASH CLOTH/RAG WITH ONLY WATER!  IT&#039;S FREE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND.  NO NEED TO BUY ANY SWIFFER RAGS, ONLY THE MOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I USE A WASH CLOTH/RAG WITH ONLY WATER!  IT&#8217;S FREE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND.  NO NEED TO BUY ANY SWIFFER RAGS, ONLY THE MOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/comment-page-1/#comment-47248</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/06/09/swiffer-sustainability-the-swiffer-designer-speaks-up/#comment-47248</guid>
		<description>Mopping does require energy to heat the water.  But it&#039;s a false comparison to put water-heating energy on one side, and Swiffer trash on the other.  Of course, the disposable Swiffer pad required energy to manufacture -- electricity generated by who knows what, probably burning coal.  

Mop with a little warm water and some vinegar, and don&#039;t bother to rinse.  Sweep with a broom first.  Voila!  Sparkling clean floors, no trash, minimal energy, no chemicals, no &quot;back strain&quot; or whatever other ridiculous marketing arguments he makes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mopping does require energy to heat the water.  But it&#8217;s a false comparison to put water-heating energy on one side, and Swiffer trash on the other.  Of course, the disposable Swiffer pad required energy to manufacture &#8212; electricity generated by who knows what, probably burning coal.  </p>
<p>Mop with a little warm water and some vinegar, and don&#8217;t bother to rinse.  Sweep with a broom first.  Voila!  Sparkling clean floors, no trash, minimal energy, no chemicals, no &#8220;back strain&#8221; or whatever other ridiculous marketing arguments he makes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
