Gallery: Taipei 101 To Be World’s Tallest Green Building

green upgrade, energy efficiency upgrade, energy efficiency, taiwan, taipei, taipei 101, world's tallest building,

Taipei 101, famous for being one of the world’s tallest buildings, is set to get some major eco-upgrades in an effort to save money, reduce its impact, and gain the much coveted title of “World’s Tallest Green Building.” In 2007, the Burj Dubai surpassed Taipei 101 in terms of height, but the Taiwanese building won’t give up the fight, throwing down $1.8 million in energy efficiency upgrades, which are expected to yield $20 million annually in savings and make it the Earth’s greenest building that’s also closest to the heavens!

Read the rest of this entry »


or your inhabitat account below


  1. BIG Designs a Pixelated... July 13, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    […] in progress, the Taipei City Wall will make use of an 82,000 sq meter site in Taiwan. The design process for the residential complex envisioned a series of boxes stacked upon one […]

  2. alawson November 17, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    I agree with SJuser. As a general rule it is much more sustainable to build up and down rather then spreading out.

  3. Joe Smith November 10, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    I agree with S Juser.

  4. sheagunther November 9, 2009 at 10:02 am

    Slight correction- the savings from the green upgrades will be $600,000 in US dollars, the $20 million savings is listed in New Taiwan dollars (NT $20 million).

    And call me a stickler, but the building will never been green. It’s greener. I think the difference is important to note.

  5. SJuser November 9, 2009 at 7:41 am

    @Michael Janzen:
    Taller buildings means more efficient use of ground space, which in turn means more space for other things like plants and trees.
    If all buildings were doubled in height, half the ground area of a city could be replaced by greens.
    Imagine every street with buildings on one side of the street, with gardens on the other.
    A hypothetical example, but not impossible, and certainly more sustainable.

  6. Krust November 9, 2009 at 1:45 am

    Hasn’t it always been the case of “mine is bigger than yours”?

  7. Michael Janzen November 5, 2009 at 11:36 am

    When will architects and commercial clients finally figure out that GIANT is NOT SUSTAINABLE. I’m happy to see that they are beginning to figure out that steps in the right direction are steps in the right direction but a green skyscraper is a greenwash no matter how you look at it.

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home