<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Car of the Future: Beyond Energy and Emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/the-car-of-the-future-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-car-of-the-future-part-2/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recessions. Fire sales. Sanity. Politicians. Nowtopias. The future. Cars. Terrorists. Pundits. &#171; social dynamite</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-car-of-the-future-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-102031</link>
		<dc:creator>Recessions. Fire sales. Sanity. Politicians. Nowtopias. The future. Cars. Terrorists. Pundits. &#171; social dynamite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/09/16/the-car-of-the-future-part-2/#comment-102031</guid>
		<description>[...] and WHOA there&#8217;s THIS about the future of cars at inhabitat! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and WHOA there&#8217;s THIS about the future of cars at inhabitat! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve N. Lee</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-car-of-the-future-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-101202</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve N. Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/09/16/the-car-of-the-future-part-2/#comment-101202</guid>
		<description>Yes, cradle to the grave thinking is needed (but not only with regards to cars). 

I recently read about Volkswagen&#039;s new &#039;bluemotion&#039; polo which gets 74mpg. In the accompanying bumpf it said they&#039;re currently building plants which will enable them to recover 95% of the materials for reuse/recycling. 

That&#039;s fantastic, if it&#039;s true. Makes you want to know why everything can&#039;t be manufactured in that way. But then we all know the simple answer to that, don&#039;t we? Profit! It costs a lot to redesign, retool, re-engineer. Sadly, most manufacturers don&#039;t see the &#039;profit&#039; in looking after the planet. Yet.

Let&#039;s hope that situation changes in the not too distant future.

Steve N. Lee
author of eco-blog http://www.lionsledbysheep.com
and suspense thriller &#039;What if...?&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, cradle to the grave thinking is needed (but not only with regards to cars). </p>
<p>I recently read about Volkswagen&#8217;s new &#8216;bluemotion&#8217; polo which gets 74mpg. In the accompanying bumpf it said they&#8217;re currently building plants which will enable them to recover 95% of the materials for reuse/recycling. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s fantastic, if it&#8217;s true. Makes you want to know why everything can&#8217;t be manufactured in that way. But then we all know the simple answer to that, don&#8217;t we? Profit! It costs a lot to redesign, retool, re-engineer. Sadly, most manufacturers don&#8217;t see the &#8216;profit&#8217; in looking after the planet. Yet.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that situation changes in the not too distant future.</p>
<p>Steve N. Lee<br />
author of eco-blog <a href="http://www.lionsledbysheep.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lionsledbysheep.com</a><br />
and suspense thriller &#8216;What if&#8230;?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
