<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sage Residence: Super High Scoring LEED Platinum Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOAO CARDOSO</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/comment-page-1/#comment-206861</link>
		<dc:creator>JOAO CARDOSO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=49387#comment-206861</guid>
		<description>good morning 

i am from PORTUGAL 
I NEED ALL INFORMATIONS ABOUT  &quot;LEED&quot;  FOR IMPORTATION DIS PRODUCT
TO IMPOR  TO PORTUGAL, I NEED FORMATION ABOUT THIS PRODUCT
IF IS POSSIBAL TELL ME</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good morning </p>
<p>i am from PORTUGAL<br />
I NEED ALL INFORMATIONS ABOUT  &#8220;LEED&#8221;  FOR IMPORTATION DIS PRODUCT<br />
TO IMPOR  TO PORTUGAL, I NEED FORMATION ABOUT THIS PRODUCT<br />
IF IS POSSIBAL TELL ME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theophile490</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/comment-page-1/#comment-180385</link>
		<dc:creator>theophile490</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=49387#comment-180385</guid>
		<description>I got to tour the home. I&#039;m with StructureHub, I find the home very beautiful.  The up-front cost is high and prohibitive to many home buyers, but as with all trends that last, the pioneers cost more before it becomes more popular.

I was most taken with the variety and beauty of the elements used to build and furnish the home. The bathroom floors are cork, the walls &amp; counters are a kind of treated paper (!), etc.  I would love to live in a home like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got to tour the home. I&#8217;m with StructureHub, I find the home very beautiful.  The up-front cost is high and prohibitive to many home buyers, but as with all trends that last, the pioneers cost more before it becomes more popular.</p>
<p>I was most taken with the variety and beauty of the elements used to build and furnish the home. The bathroom floors are cork, the walls &amp; counters are a kind of treated paper (!), etc.  I would love to live in a home like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antkm1</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/comment-page-1/#comment-176902</link>
		<dc:creator>antkm1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=49387#comment-176902</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a couple questions/comments.

1. What was the &quot;Construciton Cost? of the home?  My guess is that Eugene, being in the west coast, might have some pretty high property values.  It would interesting to know the cost-per-square-foot.  Seeing a typical 2000 s.f. home would roughly run $90-$150 per s.f.  I did a 1600 s.f. pre-fab shipping container home that was approved by build-it-green and LEED for about $150/s.f.  Of course it wasn&#039;t &quot;Platinum&quot;, but it works towards the argument that LEED = expensive.

2. Yes, as a previous comment has stated, it is a lovely design, maybe not a traditional/conservative style but this is a fairly typical style to the pacific west.  and, it&#039;s not far off from some of the 50&#039;s mod. homes seen in may cities across the country.  I think the truly telling argument would be: what kinds of tactics are architects developing to make the McMansion more eco-friendly?  Being an architect myself, it&#039;s a huge challenge, because many of the materials and products that McMansion builders want aren&#039;t very sustainable.  Developers are like CEO&#039;s of Walmart, they just look at bottom line.  I think it&#039;s up to the building industry to get in gear and demand more of their clients (whether its a developer or a single family).  There are many other factors as well.

3. It&#039;s nice that architects are building these great show-homes that show-off how eco-friendly they can be.  But an even more troubling concern that all home owners should address is, what are we doing to make our EXISTING homes LEED or more eco-friendly?  Building new just adds more waste and sprawl.  Sure, LEED has credits for reusing existing builidngs and existing locations, which probably contributed to this house&#039;s &quot;Platinum&quot; rating, but instead of building new, let&#039;s focus on fixing what we have.  It&#039;s the typical American mentality to just tear-down and start new.  But that doesn&#039;t some the big problem of waste.

Hey, Inhabitat, let&#039;s have more articles focusing on re-using or retro-fitting so people can fix what they have instead of enticing them with these golden &quot;carrots&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a couple questions/comments.</p>
<p>1. What was the &#8220;Construciton Cost? of the home?  My guess is that Eugene, being in the west coast, might have some pretty high property values.  It would interesting to know the cost-per-square-foot.  Seeing a typical 2000 s.f. home would roughly run $90-$150 per s.f.  I did a 1600 s.f. pre-fab shipping container home that was approved by build-it-green and LEED for about $150/s.f.  Of course it wasn&#8217;t &#8220;Platinum&#8221;, but it works towards the argument that LEED = expensive.</p>
<p>2. Yes, as a previous comment has stated, it is a lovely design, maybe not a traditional/conservative style but this is a fairly typical style to the pacific west.  and, it&#8217;s not far off from some of the 50&#8242;s mod. homes seen in may cities across the country.  I think the truly telling argument would be: what kinds of tactics are architects developing to make the McMansion more eco-friendly?  Being an architect myself, it&#8217;s a huge challenge, because many of the materials and products that McMansion builders want aren&#8217;t very sustainable.  Developers are like CEO&#8217;s of Walmart, they just look at bottom line.  I think it&#8217;s up to the building industry to get in gear and demand more of their clients (whether its a developer or a single family).  There are many other factors as well.</p>
<p>3. It&#8217;s nice that architects are building these great show-homes that show-off how eco-friendly they can be.  But an even more troubling concern that all home owners should address is, what are we doing to make our EXISTING homes LEED or more eco-friendly?  Building new just adds more waste and sprawl.  Sure, LEED has credits for reusing existing builidngs and existing locations, which probably contributed to this house&#8217;s &#8220;Platinum&#8221; rating, but instead of building new, let&#8217;s focus on fixing what we have.  It&#8217;s the typical American mentality to just tear-down and start new.  But that doesn&#8217;t some the big problem of waste.</p>
<p>Hey, Inhabitat, let&#8217;s have more articles focusing on re-using or retro-fitting so people can fix what they have instead of enticing them with these golden &#8220;carrots&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave66</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/comment-page-1/#comment-175806</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=49387#comment-175806</guid>
		<description>Why the ugly HDR filters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the ugly HDR filters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arborsouth</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/comment-page-1/#comment-175741</link>
		<dc:creator>arborsouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=49387#comment-175741</guid>
		<description>Just had to interject some comments here. Thanks for the nice words about how theSAGE looks. &quot;Green&quot; doesn&#039;t have to be ugly, and that was part of what we wanted to convey.

As to the costs, be sure to include the &quot;big picture&quot; in that theSAGE qualifies for almost $26,000 in tax credits and utility incentives. Add to that the $100 per month utility cost SAVINGS (estimate is $33/month for total utilities) and that would buy about $20,000 in additional mortgage. And that&#039;s initial MONETARY costs, not counting life-cycle costs or the positive effect this will have for my grandchildren.

We did use many reclaimed materials. And, as a demonstration home, we tried to pull out the stops to show what could be done. Overall sustainability WILL become mainstream; we believe that. It&#039;s a matter of making it happen instead of waiting for it to happen.

Bill Randall, AIA
Architect/Senior Principal/LEED AP
Arbor South Architecture, PC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had to interject some comments here. Thanks for the nice words about how theSAGE looks. &#8220;Green&#8221; doesn&#8217;t have to be ugly, and that was part of what we wanted to convey.</p>
<p>As to the costs, be sure to include the &#8220;big picture&#8221; in that theSAGE qualifies for almost $26,000 in tax credits and utility incentives. Add to that the $100 per month utility cost SAVINGS (estimate is $33/month for total utilities) and that would buy about $20,000 in additional mortgage. And that&#8217;s initial MONETARY costs, not counting life-cycle costs or the positive effect this will have for my grandchildren.</p>
<p>We did use many reclaimed materials. And, as a demonstration home, we tried to pull out the stops to show what could be done. Overall sustainability WILL become mainstream; we believe that. It&#8217;s a matter of making it happen instead of waiting for it to happen.</p>
<p>Bill Randall, AIA<br />
Architect/Senior Principal/LEED AP<br />
Arbor South Architecture, PC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp8zzz2</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/comment-page-1/#comment-175220</link>
		<dc:creator>sp8zzz2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 16:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=49387#comment-175220</guid>
		<description>Justinm pretty much sums it up for me.  80% of the public has no design sense and are pretty much told what is &quot;ideal&quot; by the marketers, builders and realtors.  And anyone venturing outside that preconceived envelope risks depreciation on their investment due to lower resale values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justinm pretty much sums it up for me.  80% of the public has no design sense and are pretty much told what is &#8220;ideal&#8221; by the marketers, builders and realtors.  And anyone venturing outside that preconceived envelope risks depreciation on their investment due to lower resale values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justinm</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/comment-page-1/#comment-174072</link>
		<dc:creator>justinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=49387#comment-174072</guid>
		<description>in this case, &quot;green&quot; should be a euphemism for expensive.  8/10 people that can afford a $450,000 home are going to buy a McMansion.  this is the sad fact and sustainability will continue to elude 80% of people.

we&#039;ve already seen buildings like this that showcase green tech.  let&#039;s go to the next level with reclaimed materials and see what innovation can happen with diverting things from the waste stream and reconstituting them as building materials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in this case, &#8220;green&#8221; should be a euphemism for expensive.  8/10 people that can afford a $450,000 home are going to buy a McMansion.  this is the sad fact and sustainability will continue to elude 80% of people.</p>
<p>we&#8217;ve already seen buildings like this that showcase green tech.  let&#8217;s go to the next level with reclaimed materials and see what innovation can happen with diverting things from the waste stream and reconstituting them as building materials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StructureHub</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/the-sage-residence-super-high-scoring-leed-platinum-home/comment-page-1/#comment-174049</link>
		<dc:creator>StructureHub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=49387#comment-174049</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the most satisfying part about this project is that Arbor South shows how easily eco-friendly features can blend into a home; some think that a green home will inevitably look &quot;green&quot; (commonly a euphemism for ugly), but this home shows that that need not be the case!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the most satisfying part about this project is that Arbor South shows how easily eco-friendly features can blend into a home; some think that a green home will inevitably look &#8220;green&#8221; (commonly a euphemism for ugly), but this home shows that that need not be the case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
