<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M-Velope Transformer House For Sale at Neiman Marcus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:49:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: squarerootarch</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/comment-page-1/#comment-110966</link>
		<dc:creator>squarerootarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/27/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/#comment-110966</guid>
		<description>i do agree with most of the posts here, but i have to say that the concept is worthy of experimentation. even if it&#039;s not outfitted like traditional homes, it is an interesting study and perhaps a building block for something more inhabitant friendly. i feel that this should be marketed along the lines of artwork instead of a housing alternative. it does make you think about the static nature of our current housing, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do agree with most of the posts here, but i have to say that the concept is worthy of experimentation. even if it&#8217;s not outfitted like traditional homes, it is an interesting study and perhaps a building block for something more inhabitant friendly. i feel that this should be marketed along the lines of artwork instead of a housing alternative. it does make you think about the static nature of our current housing, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Hobo</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/comment-page-1/#comment-110106</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Hobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/27/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/#comment-110106</guid>
		<description>This barely qualifies as a shelter let alone a house... geeze. But what I really really would love to know is how is this worth 100,000 dollars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This barely qualifies as a shelter let alone a house&#8230; geeze. But what I really really would love to know is how is this worth 100,000 dollars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pumpkinescobar</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/comment-page-1/#comment-109922</link>
		<dc:creator>pumpkinescobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/27/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/#comment-109922</guid>
		<description>WOW!!  This seems like the biggest waste of $100,000... even if it is made of non-toxic treated wood, it&#039;s still useless.  Buy and umbrella!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!  This seems like the biggest waste of $100,000&#8230; even if it is made of non-toxic treated wood, it&#8217;s still useless.  Buy and umbrella!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keter</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/comment-page-1/#comment-109529</link>
		<dc:creator>Keter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/27/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/#comment-109529</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Kenneth: this design is a loser.  It&#039;s not a house: a house is meant to shelter its inhabitants from the weather and insects and this one won&#039;t.  Just because something is made from sustainable materials does not mean that it is actually sustainable in practice.  This one is destined to rot away in someone&#039;s back yard or be disassembled for other projects...not an efficient use of materials or labor.  Make something that will last 300+ years with little maintenance like my concrete &quot;parking garage&quot; house and then you might impress me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Kenneth: this design is a loser.  It&#8217;s not a house: a house is meant to shelter its inhabitants from the weather and insects and this one won&#8217;t.  Just because something is made from sustainable materials does not mean that it is actually sustainable in practice.  This one is destined to rot away in someone&#8217;s back yard or be disassembled for other projects&#8230;not an efficient use of materials or labor.  Make something that will last 300+ years with little maintenance like my concrete &#8220;parking garage&#8221; house and then you might impress me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lamoose</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/comment-page-1/#comment-109454</link>
		<dc:creator>lamoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/27/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/#comment-109454</guid>
		<description>I reckon you could make this for a few hundred quid. Get about 30 pallets, a bag of nails, a bit of imagination and some hard graft, i think you could pull it off. Sustainable and recyclable too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon you could make this for a few hundred quid. Get about 30 pallets, a bag of nails, a bit of imagination and some hard graft, i think you could pull it off. Sustainable and recyclable too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M-Velope Transformer House &#124; Solar Energy Dream</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/comment-page-1/#comment-109335</link>
		<dc:creator>M-Velope Transformer House &#124; Solar Energy Dream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/27/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/#comment-109335</guid>
		<description>[...] The concept of this M-Velope Transformer House is a very good one but priced at $100,000 I hardly think that it&#8217;s worth that much. But on the brighter side of things house is made from Accoya which is a new non toxic treated wood that is said to be stronger and more durable then lumber. Also this would make for a really nice sort of camping home on a beach or wherever your getaway may be located but the price is still way to steep. If you have an extra $100,000 that your looking to spend on something you can go to Neimanmarcus now and order one. I personally would say invest that 100,000 on solar energy but that&#8217;s just me. via IH [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The concept of this M-Velope Transformer House is a very good one but priced at $100,000 I hardly think that it&#8217;s worth that much. But on the brighter side of things house is made from Accoya which is a new non toxic treated wood that is said to be stronger and more durable then lumber. Also this would make for a really nice sort of camping home on a beach or wherever your getaway may be located but the price is still way to steep. If you have an extra $100,000 that your looking to spend on something you can go to Neimanmarcus now and order one. I personally would say invest that 100,000 on solar energy but that&#8217;s just me. via IH [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/comment-page-1/#comment-109319</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/27/transformable-mvelope-by-michael-jantzen/#comment-109319</guid>
		<description>$100,000 slat-roofed shed? Sorry, but the gimmickery of this design does not outweigh the fact that this is pretty much useless for anything other than a little shade. It would not even be good as a storage shed because it would be useless in the rain. On top of that, it&#039;s pretty ugly. I&#039;m sorry to hear that Neiman&#039;s are not smart enough to offer a few of the many practical and beautiful small prefab buildings available out there--and for much less money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$100,000 slat-roofed shed? Sorry, but the gimmickery of this design does not outweigh the fact that this is pretty much useless for anything other than a little shade. It would not even be good as a storage shed because it would be useless in the rain. On top of that, it&#8217;s pretty ugly. I&#8217;m sorry to hear that Neiman&#8217;s are not smart enough to offer a few of the many practical and beautiful small prefab buildings available out there&#8211;and for much less money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
