<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY: CLEVER Project CNG Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: manujarch</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/comment-page-1/#comment-85574</link>
		<dc:creator>manujarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/06/17/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/#comment-85574</guid>
		<description>Looks like Indian Auto rickshaws-but ergonomically and technically far ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Indian Auto rickshaws-but ergonomically and technically far ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex-in-France</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/comment-page-1/#comment-85533</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex-in-France</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/06/17/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/#comment-85533</guid>
		<description>Yet another delta trike oncept with sophisticated and expensive tilting mechanism - and yet another lost opportunity IMHO. Why? because it\\\&#039;ll be too expensive.

Lets look at the average car for a second, yes it might spend a lot of its time with only one user, BUT there will be times when it\\\&#039;s got 3 or more people inside, or it\\\&#039;s full of shopping, or luggage or whatever. Now lets\\\&#039; look at the average car owner, they buy a car they like and they\\\&#039;ll pay a reasonable amout of money for it, they like the choice, the freedom and the ready availability of it sitting on their drive. The cars full of CDs, sweets, kids\\\&#039; stuff old junk etc.

Now we all want to stop them using that for their commute maybe, for the time when there\\\&#039;s just one person inside it, We\\\&#039;d all like to see our cities full of single person low emission low space vehicles like this one, BUT if we charge them as much as a car to own one, they\\\&#039;ll go and buy a car like the above mentioned Toyota or Honda or whatever. WHY? because it\\\&#039;s more practical and better value for money. This vehicle like so many before it becomes a rich boy\\\&#039;s plaything.

If you really want to get people into glorified bubblecars you have to look at why they did it last time. BECAUSE THEY WERE CHEAP!!!

So to steal a line for Pepsi - REDUCE TO THE MAX. Get rid of the tilt, make it a tadpole (two wheels at the front) trike for greater stability so it doesn\\\&#039;t need to tilt. ditch the fancy and costly technology. The aim should be to build something that competes far more with those little 125cc scooters with a correspondinly low price point. I\\\&#039;m sure if they can sell a Chinese built 125cc scooter in Europe for €1200 then they could build and sell a modern bubble car for under the €2000 price point. And then maybe you\\\&#039;ll get people to actually buy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another delta trike oncept with sophisticated and expensive tilting mechanism &#8211; and yet another lost opportunity IMHO. Why? because it\\\&#8217;ll be too expensive.</p>
<p>Lets look at the average car for a second, yes it might spend a lot of its time with only one user, BUT there will be times when it\\\&#8217;s got 3 or more people inside, or it\\\&#8217;s full of shopping, or luggage or whatever. Now lets\\\&#8217; look at the average car owner, they buy a car they like and they\\\&#8217;ll pay a reasonable amout of money for it, they like the choice, the freedom and the ready availability of it sitting on their drive. The cars full of CDs, sweets, kids\\\&#8217; stuff old junk etc.</p>
<p>Now we all want to stop them using that for their commute maybe, for the time when there\\\&#8217;s just one person inside it, We\\\&#8217;d all like to see our cities full of single person low emission low space vehicles like this one, BUT if we charge them as much as a car to own one, they\\\&#8217;ll go and buy a car like the above mentioned Toyota or Honda or whatever. WHY? because it\\\&#8217;s more practical and better value for money. This vehicle like so many before it becomes a rich boy\\\&#8217;s plaything.</p>
<p>If you really want to get people into glorified bubblecars you have to look at why they did it last time. BECAUSE THEY WERE CHEAP!!!</p>
<p>So to steal a line for Pepsi &#8211; REDUCE TO THE MAX. Get rid of the tilt, make it a tadpole (two wheels at the front) trike for greater stability so it doesn\\\&#8217;t need to tilt. ditch the fancy and costly technology. The aim should be to build something that competes far more with those little 125cc scooters with a correspondinly low price point. I\\\&#8217;m sure if they can sell a Chinese built 125cc scooter in Europe for €1200 then they could build and sell a modern bubble car for under the €2000 price point. And then maybe you\\\&#8217;ll get people to actually buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd Bogart</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/comment-page-1/#comment-85481</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd Bogart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/06/17/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/#comment-85481</guid>
		<description>Love these posts about new and innovative vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love these posts about new and innovative vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluezephyr</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/comment-page-1/#comment-85448</link>
		<dc:creator>bluezephyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/06/17/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/#comment-85448</guid>
		<description>Extremely cool.  But like so many of these concept vehicles, like the Lumeneo Smera EV, unlikely IMHO to be widely purchased because they&#039;re:

1.  Too expensive.
2.  Relatively unsafe.  Would you feel comfortable if your child was driving 60 mph in this thing?
3.  Withou a track record.  How about replacement parts?  How about parts 5 years from now?

I&#039;m all for imagining and creating a new way to get around, see value in brainstorming such ideas, and believe that such ideas may lead to great changes WAY down the road.  If that&#039;s the goal here, that&#039;s fine.

But the endless parade of cool but impractical vehicles is starting to depress me because 
I don&#039;t think it&#039;s very helpful right now.  

We have things like the Honda Fit and the Toyota Yaris.  IMHO it would be beneficial to focus some of our energy on adapting such &quot;boring&quot; vehicles into something electric.  Then you&#039;ve got a reputable name and a familiar product form that might actually have a chance at widespread acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely cool.  But like so many of these concept vehicles, like the Lumeneo Smera EV, unlikely IMHO to be widely purchased because they&#8217;re:</p>
<p>1.  Too expensive.<br />
2.  Relatively unsafe.  Would you feel comfortable if your child was driving 60 mph in this thing?<br />
3.  Withou a track record.  How about replacement parts?  How about parts 5 years from now?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for imagining and creating a new way to get around, see value in brainstorming such ideas, and believe that such ideas may lead to great changes WAY down the road.  If that&#8217;s the goal here, that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>But the endless parade of cool but impractical vehicles is starting to depress me because<br />
I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s very helpful right now.  </p>
<p>We have things like the Honda Fit and the Toyota Yaris.  IMHO it would be beneficial to focus some of our energy on adapting such &#8220;boring&#8221; vehicles into something electric.  Then you&#8217;ve got a reputable name and a familiar product form that might actually have a chance at widespread acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/comment-page-1/#comment-85445</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/06/17/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/#comment-85445</guid>
		<description>this car is a rip offf of the European Carver 3 wheeled tilt vehicle.  
The Carver company has an American counterpart which is developing a hybrid/electric vehicle called &quot;Venture One&quot;.
http://www.carver-worldwide.com/Home/Index.asp?nc=1
http://www.flytheroad.com/

I don&#039;t believe that BMW to be in the business of stealing technology so I hope there is a deal behind the scenes with Carver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this car is a rip offf of the European Carver 3 wheeled tilt vehicle.<br />
The Carver company has an American counterpart which is developing a hybrid/electric vehicle called &#8220;Venture One&#8221;.<br />
<a href="http://www.carver-worldwide.com/Home/Index.asp?nc=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.carver-worldwide.com/Home/Index.asp?nc=1</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flytheroad.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flytheroad.com/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that BMW to be in the business of stealing technology so I hope there is a deal behind the scenes with Carver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueBerry</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/comment-page-1/#comment-85443</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueBerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/06/17/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/#comment-85443</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many mpg this thing could get with a Prius type engine/battery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many mpg this thing could get with a Prius type engine/battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EHDorsey</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/comment-page-1/#comment-85442</link>
		<dc:creator>EHDorsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/06/17/transportation-tuesday-clever-project/#comment-85442</guid>
		<description>Please, is a hard copy of venture one vehicles 
see it by yourself, what do you think?

 http://www.flytheroad.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, is a hard copy of venture one vehicles<br />
see it by yourself, what do you think?</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.flytheroad.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flytheroad.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
