President Donald Trump is still trying to take a swing at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The White House’s most recent budget proposal, released yesterday, would cut money for environmental cleanup, clean air, and water programs. And thousands of people could lose their jobs as the number of full-time employees drops from 15,416 to 11,611.


Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, budget, budget proposal, proposed budget, Scott Pruitt, Donald Trump, Trump, President Donald Trump, President Trump, Trump administration, White House, pollution, air pollution, air quality, clean air, water pollution, clean water, dirty water, environment, politics

The recent Trump budget proposal lowers EPA funding to $5.65 billion. If that still sounds like a hefty sum, consider what the EPA won’t be able to do with this slashed budget: restore areas like the Great Lakes and Puget Sound and run a lead risk-reduction program. They also won’t have as much money for climate change research, environmental justice efforts, or radon detection programs. The White House proposal also just about halves categorical grants which help states and local areas address water and air quality.

Related: Trump saved a toxic pesticide – and then it poisoned a bunch of farmworkers

EPA administrator Scott Pruitt stood behind Trump’s drastic cuts; the agency put out a statement praising the returned “focus to core statutory mission,” which we guess means dirty air and polluted water for all. Pruitt even decided to say Trump’s “budget respects the American taxpayer.” This praise comes even though the proposed budget would reduce funding for Pruitt’s Superfund cleanup program – which he’s listed as a priority – by almost one third. Toxic accidents or industrial activity have polluted these Superfund sites, many of which, according to The Guardian, are close to low-income or minority communities.

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, budget, budget proposal, proposed budget, Scott Pruitt, Donald Trump, Trump, President Donald Trump, President Trump, Trump administration, White House, pollution, air pollution, air quality, clean air, water pollution, clean water, dirty water, environment, politics

National Association of Clean Air Agencies executive director S. William Becker said he was astounded the administration didn’t change much from their initial March budget proposal, even after bipartisan opposition from Congress. Lawmakers recently reached a deal for government funding through September that cuts the EPA’s budget by around one percent.

In a statement on the recent proposal, Environmental Working Group president Ken Cook said, “This isn’t a budget – it’s a road map for the President, EPA Administrator Pruitt, and polluters to see that millions of Americans drink dirtier water, breathe more polluted air, and don’t have enough nutritious food to lead healthy lives.”

Via The Washington Post

Images via Wikimedia Commons and USEPA Environmental-Protection-Agency on Flickr