<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHICH TECH BRAND IS THE GREENEST? Greenpeace Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inhabitat.com/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inhabitat.com/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/</link>
	<description>Green design &#38; eco innovation for a better world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-43343</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/09/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/#comment-43343</guid>
		<description>&quot;Meanwhile, Apple is singled out for not responding to Greenpeace’s demands, ranking last on the list.&quot;

So this isn&#039;t objective, it&#039;s basically Greenpeace attempting to blackmailing Apple, despite the fact that it has been shown time and time again that last years hit piece was highly flawed and ignored a huge number of industry firsts Apple had taken (such as setting up a recycling program for old Macs?)  Greenpeace is really damaging their credibility on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, Apple is singled out for not responding to Greenpeace’s demands, ranking last on the list.&#8221;</p>
<p>So this isn&#8217;t objective, it&#8217;s basically Greenpeace attempting to blackmailing Apple, despite the fact that it has been shown time and time again that last years hit piece was highly flawed and ignored a huge number of industry firsts Apple had taken (such as setting up a recycling program for old Macs?)  Greenpeace is really damaging their credibility on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://inhabitat.com/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-43321</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/09/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/#comment-43321</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmm.... It is not so surprising that Al &quot;The Hypocrite&quot; Gore is on the board of directors at Apple Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm&#8230;. It is not so surprising that Al &#8220;The Hypocrite&#8221; Gore is on the board of directors at Apple Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
