Site Meter
Yuka Yoneda

World’s First Grid Scale Flywheel Energy Plant Opening Soon!

by , 08/11/10

flywheel energy, alternative energy, renewable energy, kinetic energy, clean power, new york, beacon power, power grid, electricity, green technology

While it doesn’t get nearly as much attention as alternative energy sources like solar or wind power, flywheel storage technology is definitely worth looking into. A kinetic energy-based technology that stems from the same elementary movement that potters and spinners have been using for centuries, the power storage tech will soon be harnessed at the world’s first grid-scale flywheel-based energy storage plant in New York. The $69 million plant will go online later this year and will be a force to be reckoned with – Beacon Power, the company behind the operation, estimates that it will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by up to 82 per cent over its 20-year life and provide about 10 per cent of the state’s energy frequency regulation needs.

Related Posts

6 Responses to “World’s First Grid Scale Flywheel Energy Plant Opening Soon!”

  1. mrsteve007 mrsteve007 says:

    It’ll be interested to see how they do. I have two (now discontinued) beacon power PV inverters, and they haven’t exactly been the best in terms of support or reliability.

  2. lukep lukep says:

    AWESOME green tech. Makes even Solar look like a corporate polluter!

  3. MrScottFletcher MrScottFletcher says:

    Pretty impressive, though 20 megawatts is less than one percent of the 2.1 gigawatts required to send Marty back in time.

  4. archonic archonic says:

    \”estimates that it will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by up to 82 per cent over its 20-year life\”

    Up to 82% over what!?!? Fly wheels have been done at utility scale before, and failed.

  5. van-chuck van-chuck says:

    The numbers and units in this article are confusing.

    Watts are a measure of power (the rate of flow)
    Watt-hours are a measure of energy (the sum of flows)

    Since we’re talking about energy storage, the units should be measuring the total (sum) amount of energy, not instantaneous power. The article references “20 megawatts of energy storage”, but “20 megawatts” refers to a rate, and therefore doesn’t make any sense when talking about storage capacity.

    It should be “20 megawatt-hours” if this is describing its storage capacity. If it is referring to its maximum instantaneous output then 20MW would make sense, however that would be a relatively meaningless metric since it doesn’t speak to the capacity (although using the 15 minute figure it could be calculated to be 300MWh).

    In full defense of Inhabitat, both the source article and original press release use the same units and are therefore just as confusing (or incorrect).

  6. bobsomm bobsomm says:

    Van-Chuck, the article says it can store 20 MWatts which can be fed back for 15 minutes. That is 5 MW Hours.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

Add your comments

NEW USER

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
What are you looking for? (Solar, HVAC, etc.)
Where are you located?