Just about every country in the world grapples with pollution, no matter how rich or poor they are. But you may not be aware of just how toxic your locale is. The Eco Experts from the United Kingdom recently cross-referenced data to rank the countries of the world by toxicity on a new map, and some of the results may surprise you.
To create their map, The Eco Experts scrutinized data for 135 countries on carbon emissions, air pollution levels, and energy consumption, along with how much the countries draw on renewable energy. They also considered how many people have died from poor air quality. Bringing together all the individual rankings, The Eco Experts determined which countries are most damaging the environment and risking public health.
Related: New Google Timelapse shows how humans have destroyed Earth over 32 years
They ranked Saudi Arabia as the world’s most toxic country, with the highest recorded air pollution levels. Other oil-rich countries like Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates topped the list as well. The United States ranked 66, doing better than countries like Canada, China, or Russia but worse than India and the United Kingdom. One surprise was that Nordic countries like Iceland and Norway guzzle more energy than others.
Meanwhile, the top five least toxic countries are all located in Africa. The world’s least toxic country is Kenya, followed by Tanzania, Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Cameroon.
In a press release, Jon Whiting of The Eco Experts said, “This research is a way of naming and shaming the worst offenders around the world. Their lack of action against emissions not only puts their populations at risk of deadly pollution-related diseases but also threatens the future of our planet. These threats are not distant concerns for future generations; their effects are being felt now and lives are already being lost. This research highlights the need for every country to act fast and put more investment into renewable energy alternatives.”
Images courtesy of The Eco Experts
I wonder if this research considers the impact of intensive livestock farming and monocoltures to feed millions of animals, being proved it affects air pollution with an enormous 40% of methane emission on the total. Methane has 20 times higher warming potential than carbon dioxide... Moreover we should consider water pollution, deforestation, considering industrial agriculture uses a massive 70% of the word's fresh water supplies. This taken into account, I also guess how can we still produce serious researches only considering geo-political borders, as if deforesation in Brazil would not affect the rest of the world or air pollution and energy consumption in Mongolia are not bad for near Nepal ;-)
Proud to be an Indian
Brazil is one of the least toxic, and Canada more toxic than the US? I'm just talkin' outa my hindquarters, what do I know, but.... Really?
Is this toxicity per person or per land area? This article doesn't explain this very well.
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index#/media/File:2014_UN_Human_Development_Report_Quartiles.svg
Is there a way to see the correlation between population, modernized societies and pollution?