While the news media focuses its attention on the withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and the scandals related President Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen, the Trump Administration quietly ended the Carbon Monitoring System (CMS). Administered by NASA with a $10 million annual budget, CMS tracked the flow of Earth’s carbon – a particularly important mission as the United States and other nations confront climate change. “If you cannot measure emissions reductions, you cannot be confident that countries are adhering to the agreement,” Kelly Sims Gallagher, director of Tufts University’s Center for International Environment and Resource Policy, told Science. Gallagher described the administration’s decision to end the program as “a grave mistake.”

Continue reading below
Our Featured Videos

A green forest as seen from the forest floor

Much of the work done by the CMS since 2010 has focused on forests and the carbon that they contain. One such project involved a collaboration between NASA and the US Forestry Service, in which the organizations created an aircraft-based laser imaging device to quantify forest carbon stocks. “They’ve now completed an inventory of forest carbon in Alaska at a fraction of the cost,” CMS science team leader George Hurtt told Science. The CMS has also used its capacity to support other countries in their efforts to preserve and study their forest stocks, particularly in tropical locations.

Related: Even NASA isn’t quite sure how to explain these holes in the Arctic Sea’s ice

Though disheartening for those who work to combat climate change, the Trump Administration’s decision to end CMS fits with its previous policy making on climate change. However, this decision, like others, puts the United States outside of the global climate mainstream. “The topic of climate mitigation and carbon monitoring is maybe not the highest priority now in the United States,” said Hurtt. “But it is almost everywhere else.” The work of carbon monitoring will continue in Europe, though the United States has ceded leadership in the process. “We really shoot ourselves in the foot if we let other people develop the technology,” president of the Woods Hole Research Center Phil Duff told Science.

Via ScienceAlert

Images via IIP Photo Archive/Flickr and Joshua Meyer/Flickr