Gallery: Dinosaur farts may have caused prehistoric global warming

 

We know that today’s cows are responsible for producing staggering amounts of heat-trapping methane gas, a major driver of climate change, but British scientists now claim that dinosaurs with vegetarian diets may have contributed to prehistoric global warming simply by passing gas. Dr. Dave Wilkinson from Liverpool John Moores University led the study, which was published in the journal Current Biology. He told The Telegraph “Indeed, our calculations suggest that these dinosaurs could have produced more methane than all modern sources.”

Sauropod dinosaurs that roamed the planet 150 million years ago may have released more methane gas into the atmosphere than all modern sources combined. Although methane does not stay in the atmosphere as long as carbon dioxide, it is 20 times more effective at trapping heat than CO2. “A simple mathematical model suggests that the microbes living in sauropod dinosaurs may have produced enough methane to have an important effect on the Mesozoic climate,” Dr. Wilkinson told The Telegraph.

The researchers compared sauropods to the modern dairy and beef industry. “Global methane emissions from medium-sized sauropods that weighed about 20 tonnes would have amounted to around 472 million tonnes per year,” the study concluded. That amount is roughly equivalent to the 500 million tonnes of methane released into the atmosphere today. Prior to the industrial revolution, before beef production exploded, natural methane emissions only added up to 181 million tonnes per year.

Via The Telegraph

Image credit: dinosaurs, Brachiosaurus, Shutterstock

LEAVE A COMMENT

or your inhabitat account below

Let's make sure you're a real person:


1 Comment

  1. roughdesigns January 11, 2015 at 3:02 pm

    It’s “revelations” like this that give industrial “apologists” arguments against global warming. It’s hard to believe no one had factored animal (albeit reptile / dinosaur) methane production into climate models. How were the models validated then? “Tweaking” until it looked like it worked? How un – scientific, and un – reliable.
    Humanities ability to jump to conclusions and take short cuts is what scares me about “fixing” global warming. Will we fix it, or just make something worse? Maybe we just need to adapt to the changes and let mother natures natural feedback loops work over time to address this extreme as it has others.
    Don’t get me wrong, I’m 100% behind stopping carbon production, and all other pollution, moving to alt energy sources, closed cycle resource use, etc.. Even without global warming it makes sense for our health, standard of living, etc..
    Russell Higgins AIA
    Roughdesigns.com

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home