Gallery: Gehry’s Luna Park Plan to Transform Historic French Site is Pu...

 

Frank Gehry’s vision for a series of his signature folded towers placed in the heart of the historic Parc des Ateliers in Arles, France will have to wait – as the project has just been put on hold. The French National Commission for Historical Sites and Monument has rejected two of the five necessary permits required for the Luna Park campus development to commence, casting doubt over the process of integrating contemporary architecture while preserving the historic character of a city. The dispute highlights a critical issue: how urban communities decide to successfully develop while maintaining their identity, culture, and quality of life.

Gehry may be the most celebrated and controversial architect of our time, as he has added an entirely new vocabulary to building design. Some of his most famous works now define the places where they are built, but his buildings can also be seen as distractions that do not appropriately reflect their sites or the environment. Gehry’s design for Luna Park consists of a series of undulating and folded towers that stand like metallic mounds high above the traditional buildings, serving as a catalyst for creativity and education.

The French National Commission for Historical Sites and Monuments has listed two major issues with his proposal to develop the cultural campus anchored by parametric towers. The Commission states that the towers will obscure a medieval bell tower and their construction “would disturb the underground Roman-Gallo Sarcophagi”. In essence: move it or lose it.

The tension between development projects and historical groups has always been palpable, and as new building space becomes more difficult to find the problem will only increase exponentially. If Gehry’s design is seen as too radical for the UNESCO-protected historical city and viewed as a disruption to the city’s identity, then the idea of building up could become more difficult in many older urban settings. A city is very much a living thing, and what is built today becomes a part of the identity of future inhabitants, so the rejection could also be seen as a symptom of a city becoming frozen, no longer able to adapt to its 21st century inhabitants.

Via Plataforma Arquitectura

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

or your inhabitat account below

Let's make sure you're a real person:


2 Comments

  1. mahdi August 3, 2011 at 6:38 am

    im always against ruining old cities with contemporary architecture, it doesnt fit and ruin rhe harmony in city atmosphere. and no one noticed this but once those buildings are gone they gone forever. today architects cannot reproduce buildings in classical manner anymore (and the lavish decoration in it) if they want to build it they should build it in modern city

  2. lazlopink July 25, 2011 at 3:30 pm

    gehry makes things ugly. no amount of pretentious sniffery will change that. the man might be qualified to put up a jungle gym but he his architectural legacy will be one of unattractive travesties that have no purposeful point. my hat is off to the french national commission on historic sites. urban density needn’t mean having to endure the stacked garbage that gehry peddles.

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >