Gallery: Istanbul Unveils $1 Billion Green Super Development

turkey, istanbul, green development, RMJM, varyup, mixed-use development, wind power, rainwater collection, residential, financial district, LEED

In what is set to be the greenest development in Turkey, Istanbul recently unveiled the VARYAP Meridian Project, a mixed-use super-development that will house the city’s new financial and business district. Set in the Atasehir District at the crossroads of major highways, subway lines and near the airport, the new project will be a model for future green development. New York and Istanbul-based RMJM are designing the project to LEED standards and have carefully analyzed the site to take advantage of the surrounding topography, climate and context.

Read the rest of this entry »


or your inhabitat account below


  1. herbistanbul April 7, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    firstl i d like to inform restorm that it was only brownfield and it transformed into a new ideology of green friend building!

    but the main question is way far from that u already asked the main problem is that how a 60 level building can be green? andtyhe sudden question appears is LEEDS enough to judge a building to be friend of nature? or is it a new way to sell a penthouse up to 5 million dollars?

  2. Amer January 5, 2010 at 4:43 am

    I Really Liked This development And the Idea Of Improving The World on Building A projects for Keeping and Protecting The Green Life Around This World.
    Thank You for letting us know about this good work for the improvements,And special thanks for RMJM Company and its nice projects.

    I Would Ask You To Visit My website, and check information about Architecture Engineering and Its Development,and The New exclusive Projects Made By Famous And World Wide Company.

  3. erginv September 17, 2009 at 3:34 pm


    There was only brownfield, nothing else

  4. restorm September 17, 2009 at 1:41 am

    This looks great, but the article left out crucial information: what was already on the site? Was it a brownfield (good) or ugly, useless buildings (good)? Was it an endangered wetland or beautiful historic building or vibrant-but-poor minority neighborhood (bad)? No discussion of a so-called “green” or “sustainable” project should ignore what was destroyed to make way for it. Some things are worth destroying (old Walmarts), and others aren’t. – Storm Cunningham

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home