Soon, the water in Gijon, a harbor in Northern Spain will be monitored by robotic, battery-powered fish. These mechanical, articulating sea creatures were designed and tested by the Robotics Department at the University of Essex. At a cost of $3.6 million, through a European Union grant, these fish will test the water for oxygen levels, detect oil slicks and other contaminants pumped into the water. This is the first monitoring program of it’s kind, and the retrieved data could be very important, with implications for global warming and the state of our water sources.
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU:
XRelated Posts
-
If you thought there could be nothing better than a world-record-setting wave-powered nautical robot, you were wrong. The PacX Wave Glider team of robots is
-
What if robots could lead fish away from major danger zones like, say, a massive oil spill off the Gulf Coast? It might be possible
-
The researchers at the United States’ Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) are geniuses – so far they’ve invented GPS, stealth technology, and the Internet. Now
2 Responses to “Monitoring Water Pollution With Robotic Fish”
-
Featured Author
2012 Pritzker Prize Awarded to Wang Shu – First Chinese Architect to Win the Award
Curved House is a Modern Residence with Distinctive Sustainable Strategies in Missouri
Sugarhouse Studios Pop-Up Cinema & Workshop Encourages Community Interaction in London
Luxurious Floating Home Makes the Most of Its Small Footprint on Lake Union in Seattle
This author's twitter feed is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
-
Read Inhabitat
-
Search Categories
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
-
Browse by Keyword
follow inhabitat on:
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
© Inhabitat.com 2012 | About Inhabitat | Contact Us | Advertising with Inhabitat | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Inhabitat, LLC


























I know that this is a very important topic, but $28,000???? for each fish?!? and are they going to put them in every river too? theyre not even solving the problem theyre just telling us how bad it is in certain points. We already know its bad! Could this money not be better spent stopping the cause of the problem in the first place? Like better filtration of waste into the river, or creating technology which not only monitors the CO2 and O2 levels but regulates it also to stop tropification (which causes the delicate river ecosystem of the river to die).
what happens, since it looks and swims so real, if a shark or some other predator eats it? LOL that’d be one of the most expensive fish-dinners on this planet!! But seriously??