Gallery: Researchers Find Potential UV Exposure Risk from Compact Fluor...

 

A study by the State University of New York at Stony Brook revealed that manufacturing flaws in some compact fluorescent bulbs can lead to potential UV exposure. Compact fluorescent bulbs, which have become popular in recent years as the result of new federal efficiency standards, are an energy-efficient alternative to the common incandescent bulb. But due to manufacturing flaws, they could expose skin to the damaging effects of UV light, potentially leading to skin cell damage and possibly cancer.

The study, published in the scientific journal Photochemistry and Photobiology, reveals that tiny bald spots in the phosphor coating in compact fluorescent bulbs allow UV light to escape. While fluorescent bulbs have always produced this UV light, which is emitted by the mercury vapor comes in contact with an electrical current, it is usually been absorbed by phosphors which make up the powdery white coating on the inside of the bulb. But if that coating cracks, the UV light can escape.

Researches say that compact fluorescent bulbs are prone to cracking due to the manufacturing process, which causes cracking in the phosphor coating while the bulbs are twisted into the familiar curlicue shape. Phosphor, which is brittle, cracks when bent.

The research is still in the preliminary phase and hasn’t been tested outside of the lab, which means that there haven’t been any known cases of sunburn caused by compact fluorescent bulbs, and researchers say that avoiding the UV exposure isn’t difficult. Staying a few feet away from the bulbs or keeping a piece of glass between the bulb will eliminate exposure risk. Further study is necessary, and other energy-efficient bulbs, such as LED bulbs, don’t appear to pose the same risk.

+ State University of New York at Stony Brook

Via NPR and Ecouterre

LEAVE A COMMENT

or your inhabitat account below

Let's make sure you're a real person:


1 Comment

  1. sheila t August 9, 2012 at 2:31 pm

    Thank you Kristine!
    I checked more about it
    It seems UVC radiation ( a kind of UV) is the main problem,
    damaging radiation normally absorbed by the ozone layer
    Good about Stony Brook study, the UV radiation and effects
    with diagrams comparing with other light bulbs!
    http://tonn.ie/2012/07/new-study-on-cfl-uv-radiation.html

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
What are you looking for? (Solar, HVAC, etc.)
Where are you located?