Gigantic Water Harvesting Skyscrapers Could Solve Sudan’s Drought

by , 08/27/11

Watertower, H3AR architecture, polish architecture, sudan, architecture for sudan, drought-proof architecture, green architecture, sustainable architecture, eco architecture, green design, eco design, sustainable design

H3Ar’s plan calls for three towers to be built. The towers would be constructed from stacked dry clay bricks, which would be manufactured on site. Why bricks? They can be manufactured locally, are a sustainable building material, and are tied to the local community. The bricks would be made with a mixture of earth, cement, and water. The shape of the towers provides shade on the ground, stabilizing the microclimate, and between them an artificial lake would be created. This artificial lake would further assist in creating solace amid the harsh African environment.

H3Ar, have certainly created a very cool design to solve an extremely difficult problem. While still a concept at the moment, the project provides a reminder that good design can have far-reaching consequences.

+ H3Ar

Related Posts


or your inhabitat account below


  1. Shannon Slanina September 4, 2013 at 10:47 am

    How much for just one to get the ball rolling more like in other places with some resources.

  2. jd1230 August 29, 2011 at 1:36 am

    If they were made out of bricks what would hold the water within the building? It would need to be reinforced with steal I would imagine. That much water pressure, depending on the volume of water would put a lot of stress on those bricks.

    Seems like a neat idea – but the guy above might be right. Well’s might be more realistic. I know nothing about the area though.

    Id like to know more about the project.

  3. pwmuchmore August 26, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    I believe you mean underground lakes instead of “underwater lakes” Very interesting article.

  4. anothervoice August 26, 2011 at 9:21 am

    …and all H3AR needs is a rich western government to underwrite their solution in search of a problem. The cost to benefit ratio for this project is unsustainable. And inhabitat knows this – we’ve seen this design on the blogs in other contexts. A better solution for every money spent would be providing standard deep wells to supplement individual family cisterns, and low water use gardening technologies.

    It’s an interesting design, but how many people will it help on a daily basis and what is the cost per person effected? If it’s more than a hundred dollars per individual, I doubt that it’s cost-effective.

  • Read Inhabitat

  • Search Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Browse by Keyword

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home