You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In
Signup with Inhabitat
Sign me up for weekly Inhabitat updates
How does it handle sea storms, tsunamis and huge waves?
wonder what its effect on marine life would be.
It would be really great if they extracted Hydrogen directly from the sea to fuel their tower. It could be one of their main exports. I was worried people would get sea-sick, but with those tendrils absorbing kinetic energy, it would actually be pretty stable I think. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKMN-dz8n3k these guys could run maintenance :D
Skyscrapers already have lighting available 100% of the time.
Skyscrapers already need ventilation systems to keep them oxygenized, 100% of the time.
Drinking water can easily be obtained via reverse-osmosis, which only takes energy to run.
Food can be supplied via vertical hydroponic farms that could actually exist inside the walls of the skyscraper. Alternatively, floating side-along buildings could contain them. One major plus of this is that it could become 100% automated.
We're talking about a future where there is not enough land mass to support the population, I think we'd be happy for what trees we've got.
Your 'problems' are insignifcant; think of real ones please.
Mike, we have have a patented technology which generates unlimited power and could provide not only energy but revenue for your city at sea concept. We are currently in planning for our first project to be located in the Pacific 300 miles of the coast of Washington and Oregon. This make sense as a renewable energy source and due to the distance from shore will require building a full time community at sea: http://youtu.be/F6-_UTU_bJ0
It is a novel solution, or at least a starting point. There are several practical areas to note, some have been listed above.
Permanent lighting required for any decks below 30m
Ventilation of submerged portion
Area available for oxygen production/agriculture/farming
Waste products of Humans and livestock
Pressure against the hulls on the lower portions
Corrosion from salt water/sea air
Increase in atmospheric pressure on lower decks
Protecting the top section during sever storms - Hurricanes
Increasing the sea levels further from water displacement
Those were off the top of my head, I'm sure someone with a background in civil engineering could list more. Still not a bad take on a solution, but without thought into the possible problems it's just fantasy.
This is the perfect solution to over-crowded prisons. Prisons require too much land to keep security. A vast ocean would be a much better security fence.
I rather see this as an optimistic approach to the future of sustainable city. Its been a while since archigram did it! Plus to solve everything in an A1 size board is almost impossible.
Chillax~ its only an idea competition. Why so serious?
yes, this thing might be cool.. but as mvbarq says, there are more negative effects.. tsunami may explain this..lol
and are those buildings float?
I think the idea has no sense because of its lack of consistance. 30 meters under the sea level there is no sunlight so you need 24h of artificial light. Is it efficient?
How do you solve the natural air ventilation and oxigen supply? How do you solve the garbage that humans produce everyday?
How do you solve the drinking water supply if you live in the middle of the ocean?
How do you solve the food supply? I mean, Where do you locate a farm with cows, sheets, pigs and chickens?
A few trees on the roof of the project means nothing. Any park have more trees and green spaces than the space you have in there.
Please, if you have a 'cool idea', think about the consecuences and solve them. I do not believe in anything that has no innovative solution for any of the things the project was aimed.
What scares me a tiny bit, but not to the point of insanity is this. That if his was created the only people who would be going to this is and surviving would be therich people and everyone else would probably be stuck on a land this getting smaller and smaller everday.
On a lighter side Kevin Costner will have gils :D
It will never exist... Sadly, maybe.
I don't know if the artist or designer has ever been scuba diving before, but it doesn't look like they're aware of the fact that once you get down past 20 feet or so it starts getting dark really fast. If this thing is roughly as deep as the Empire State Building is tall, it's gonna be permanent night basically at the bottom.
Those birds must have a wingspan of 100 meters. And the diver... OMG and how big are the sharks?
one step closer to real-life bioshock, lol.
You've got to be kidding me.
The sea would chew this thing up and spit it out in tiny little pieces.
cool idea and i like the self-sustainable part, but what about the affect it will have on the eco-system in the water? it will be messing with the habitat of the sea and causing a serious lack of sunlight below and around these places possibly ruining both plants and sea creatures' homes
I hope this design would be in a list of things to do when we face the danger of rising ocean surface so people would find alternative ways of living.
I hope it is not one more "green idea" of "buying a home for the weekend" because I am rich, if you know what I mean.
Now, if they were really genius, they'd use the Great Pacific Garbage Patch for their materials!
Great idea.....man this would be real cool in our region, the land of Sun.
Save on a lot and using nature to harness energy and food and enjoy both sides of planet Earth.
nice idea...but those sure look like coffins tethered to the end of the "tentacles"....
Welcome to Inhabitat, your online guide to the best green design ideas, innovations and inspiration to build a cleaner, brighter, and better future.
Almost finished... We need to confirm your email address. To complete the subscription process, please click the link in the email we just sent you.
View Gallery (10)
View Gallery (7)
by Timon Singh, 34 mins ago
by Lucy Wang, 59 mins ago
by Tafline Laylin, 2 hours ago
by Nicole Jewell, 2 hours ago
by Kristine Lofgren, 2 hours ago
by Lucy Wang, 3 hours ago
by Emily Peckenham, 3 hours ago
by Lidija Grozdanic, 4 hours ago
by Cat DiStasio, 4 hours ago
by Lucy Wang, 5 hours ago
by Michelle Kennedy Hogan, 6 hours ago
by Cat DiStasio, 8 hours ago